* Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) [not found] <56c509fa208ab_3596f5b338144b@ss1435.mail> @ 2016-02-18 10:01 ` Ian Campbell 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Razvan Cojocaru 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ian Campbell @ 2016-02-18 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Corneliu ZUZU, Razvan Cojocaru; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, xen-devel On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 16:02 -0800, scan-admin@coverity.com wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject > found with Coverity Scan. > > 1 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan. > 4 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the > recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. > > New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan > Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) > > > ** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) > /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() This appears to have been introduced by: commit 557c7873f35aa39bd84977b28948457b1b342f92 Author: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdef ender.com> Date: Mon Feb 15 14:14:16 2016 +0100 x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 This patch merges almost identical functions hvm_event_int3 and hvm_event_single_step into a single function called hvm_event_breakpoint. Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process. Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU < czuzu@bitdefender.com > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru < rcojocaru@bitdefender.com > Acked-by: Jan Beulich < jbeulich@suse.com > hvm_event_breakpoint calls hvm_event_traps(&req) and if sync is true that ors some bits into req->flags which was never initialised. > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________ > *** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) > /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() > 170 > 171 int hvm_event_breakpoint(unsigned long rip, > 172 enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type type) > 173 { > 174 struct vcpu *curr = current; > 175 struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch; > > > > CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) > > > > Declaring variable "req" without initializer. > 176 vm_event_request_t req; > 177 > 178 switch ( type ) > 179 { > 180 case HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT: > 181 if ( !ad->monitor.software_breakpoint_enabled ) > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________ > To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://scan.coverity.com/pro > jects/xenproject?tab=overview > > To manage Coverity Scan email notifications for > "ian.campbell@citrix.com", click https://scan.coverity.com/subscriptions/ > edit?email=ian.campbell%40citrix.com&token=1ce0fc428b9f94f66fd8d1ecf6cbb7 > 6a > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) 2016-02-18 10:01 ` Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) Ian Campbell @ 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU 2016-02-18 10:17 ` Razvan Cojocaru 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Razvan Cojocaru 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Corneliu ZUZU @ 2016-02-18 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Campbell, Razvan Cojocaru; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, xen-devel On 2/18/2016 12:01 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 16:02 -0800, scan-admin@coverity.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject >> found with Coverity Scan. >> >> 1 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan. >> 4 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the >> recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. >> >> New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan >> Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) >> >> >> ** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() > This appears to have been introduced by: > commit > 557c7873f35aa39bd84977b28948457b1b342f92 > Author: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdef > ender.com> > Date: Mon Feb 15 14:14:16 2016 +0100 > > x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 > > This patch merges almost identical functions hvm_event_int3 and > hvm_event_single_step into a single function called hvm_event_breakpoint. > Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process. > > Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU < czuzu@bitdefender.com > > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru < rcojocaru@bitdefender.com > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich < jbeulich@suse.com > > > > hvm_event_breakpoint calls hvm_event_traps(&req) and if sync is true that > ors some bits into req->flags which was never initialised. > >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> _______________________________ >> *** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() >> 170 >> 171 int hvm_event_breakpoint(unsigned long rip, >> 172 enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type type) >> 173 { >> 174 struct vcpu *curr = current; >> 175 struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch; >>>>> CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>>>> Declaring variable "req" without initializer. >> 176 vm_event_request_t req; >> 177 >> 178 switch ( type ) >> 179 { >> 180 case HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT: >> 181 if ( !ad->monitor.software_breakpoint_enabled ) >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> _______________________________ >> To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://scan.coverity.com/pro >> jects/xenproject?tab=overview >> >> To manage Coverity Scan email notifications for >> "ian.campbell@citrix.com", click https://scan.coverity.com/subscriptions/ >> edit?email=ian.campbell%40citrix.com&token=1ce0fc428b9f94f66fd8d1ecf6cbb7 >> 6a >> Sorry, my bad, I didn't know struct-initialization using labels sets all the other fields to zero. Shall I submit a fix for this issue? Corneliu. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU @ 2016-02-18 10:17 ` Razvan Cojocaru 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Razvan Cojocaru @ 2016-02-18 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Corneliu ZUZU, Ian Campbell; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, xen-devel On 02/18/2016 12:13 PM, Corneliu ZUZU wrote: > On 2/18/2016 12:01 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 16:02 -0800, scan-admin@coverity.com wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject >>> found with Coverity Scan. >>> >>> 1 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan. >>> 4 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the >>> recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. >>> >>> New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan >>> Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) >>> >>> >>> ** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() >> This appears to have been introduced by: >> commit >> 557c7873f35aa39bd84977b28948457b1b342f92 >> Author: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdef >> ender.com> >> Date: Mon Feb 15 14:14:16 2016 +0100 >> >> x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 >> This patch merges almost identical functions >> hvm_event_int3 and >> hvm_event_single_step into a single function called >> hvm_event_breakpoint. >> Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process. >> Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU < >> czuzu@bitdefender.com > >> Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru < rcojocaru@bitdefender.com > >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich < jbeulich@suse.com > >> >> >> hvm_event_breakpoint calls hvm_event_traps(&req) and if sync is true that >> ors some bits into req->flags which was never initialised. >> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> _______________________________ >>> *** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() >>> 170 >>> 171 int hvm_event_breakpoint(unsigned long rip, >>> 172 enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type type) >>> 173 { >>> 174 struct vcpu *curr = current; >>> 175 struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch; >>>>>> CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>>>>> Declaring variable "req" without initializer. >>> 176 vm_event_request_t req; >>> 177 >>> 178 switch ( type ) >>> 179 { >>> 180 case HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT: >>> 181 if ( !ad->monitor.software_breakpoint_enabled ) >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> _______________________________ >>> To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, >>> https://scan.coverity.com/pro >>> jects/xenproject?tab=overview >>> >>> To manage Coverity Scan email notifications for >>> "ian.campbell@citrix.com", click >>> https://scan.coverity.com/subscriptions/ >>> edit?email=ian.campbell%40citrix.com&token=1ce0fc428b9f94f66fd8d1ecf6cbb7 >>> >>> 6a >>> > > Sorry, my bad, I didn't know struct-initialization using labels sets all > the other fields to zero. > Shall I submit a fix for this issue? Right, req->flags. Good catch. Yes, please do, req = {}; should do. Thanks, Razvan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) 2016-02-18 10:01 ` Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) Ian Campbell 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU @ 2016-02-18 10:13 ` Razvan Cojocaru 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Razvan Cojocaru @ 2016-02-18 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Campbell, Corneliu ZUZU; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, xen-devel On 02/18/2016 12:01 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 16:02 -0800, scan-admin@coverity.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to XenProject >> found with Coverity Scan. >> >> 1 new defect(s) introduced to XenProject found with Coverity Scan. >> 4 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the >> recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. >> >> New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan >> Showing 1 of 1 defect(s) >> >> >> ** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() > > This appears to have been introduced by: > commit > 557c7873f35aa39bd84977b28948457b1b342f92 > Author: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdef > ender.com> > Date: Mon Feb 15 14:14:16 2016 +0100 > > x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 > > This patch merges almost identical functions hvm_event_int3 and > hvm_event_single_step into a single function called hvm_event_breakpoint. > Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process. > > Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU < czuzu@bitdefender.com > > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru < rcojocaru@bitdefender.com > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich < jbeulich@suse.com > > > > hvm_event_breakpoint calls hvm_event_traps(&req) and if sync is true that > ors some bits into req->flags which was never initialised. > >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> _______________________________ >> *** CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >> /xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c: 176 in hvm_event_breakpoint() >> 170 >> 171 int hvm_event_breakpoint(unsigned long rip, >> 172 enum hvm_event_breakpoint_type type) >> 173 { >> 174 struct vcpu *curr = current; >> 175 struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch; >>>>> CID 1353192: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) >>>>> Declaring variable "req" without initializer. >> 176 vm_event_request_t req; >> 177 >> 178 switch ( type ) >> 179 { >> 180 case HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT: >> 181 if ( !ad->monitor.software_breakpoint_enabled ) But the structure is being initialized in both cases (HVM_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT and HVM_EVENT_SINGLESTEP_BREAKPOINT), and the default case returns, so it's not possible to get to the hvm_event_traps(&req) call with an uninitialized req. Am I missing something? Thanks, Razvan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-18 10:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <56c509fa208ab_3596f5b338144b@ss1435.mail>
2016-02-18 10:01 ` Uninitialized variables in hvm_event_breakpoint (Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for XenProject) Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 10:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-18 10:17 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-02-18 10:13 ` Razvan Cojocaru
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.