From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <luto@amacapital.net>,
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:34:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C71A03.7030105@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455887316-9223-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I originally set out to rename paravirt_enabled() to paravirt_legacy()
> but we instead decided to remove paravirt_enabled() completely. Although
> I have some linker table work which will help make this cleaner, instead
> of waiting for that to go in, just remove the known cases that should
> be safe for paravirt_enabled() and also replace it for the subarch
> use.
I don't understand the purpose of this series. How is replacing "if
(A)" with "if (B)" an improvement?
Using the hardware subarch in this way looks like paravirt_enabled()
with a slightly different flavour and I don't think this is that useful
to determine if certain hardware features should be used.
I think you should consider a finer-grained set of feature bits. e.g.,
platform_has_pc_rtc() and platform_has_tboot() etc.
David
>
> While at it, document the subarch to avoid any possible misuses.
>
> Luis R. Rodriguez (9):
> x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch
> tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly
> x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots
> x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch
> apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use
> x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled()
> x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around
> x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check
> pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 6 ------
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 5 -----
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/head.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 6 ------
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +---
> drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c | 4 +++-
> tools/lguest/lguest.c | 4 ++--
> 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 13:08 [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 15:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 20:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 22:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-20 0:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 14:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 14:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 6:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-22 14:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-22 23:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:27 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:34 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2016-02-19 14:36 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C71A03.7030105@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.