From: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao@suse.de>
To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>,
'Gregory Farnum' <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Subject: 'mon_addr' vs 'public_addr'
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:07:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CC9FFD.2030801@suse.de> (raw)
Hi all,
does anyone remember the rationale behind not simply relying on
'public_addr' instead of 'mon_addr' for the monitors?
I keep coming back to this, and I keep thinking this must be an artefact
of some long-gone era, during which public_addr maybe didn't exist? I
tried to backtrace its inception and ended up all the way in af870763
back from 2009, but the commit itself didn't help much.
Any thoughts?
-Joao
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 18:07 Joao Eduardo Luis [this message]
2016-02-23 18:16 ` 'mon_addr' vs 'public_addr' Sage Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CC9FFD.2030801@suse.de \
--to=joao@suse.de \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=sage@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.