* Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? @ 2016-02-23 19:25 Darcy Watkins 2016-02-23 19:53 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-23 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto Hi, CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? -- Regards, Darcy --- Darcy Watkins Staff Engineer, Firmware Sierra Wireless 13811 Wireless Way, Richmond, BC Canada, V6V 3A4 [P1] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-23 19:25 Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-23 19:53 ` Khem Raj 2016-02-23 21:51 ` Mark Hatle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-23 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darcy Watkins; +Cc: yocto On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins <dwatkins@sierrawireless.com> wrote: > Hi, > > CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc > since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). > > Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. > > -- > > Regards, > > Darcy > > --- > > Darcy Watkins > Staff Engineer, Firmware > Sierra Wireless > 13811 Wireless Way, Richmond, BC > Canada, V6V 3A4 > [P1] > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-23 19:53 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-02-23 21:51 ` Mark Hatle 2016-02-23 22:52 ` Darcy Watkins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mark Hatle @ 2016-02-23 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins > <dwatkins@sierrawireless.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >> >> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? > > yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) --Mark >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Darcy >> >> --- >> >> Darcy Watkins >> Staff Engineer, Firmware >> Sierra Wireless >> 13811 Wireless Way, Richmond, BC >> Canada, V6V 3A4 >> [P1] >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-23 21:51 ` Mark Hatle @ 2016-02-23 22:52 ` Darcy Watkins 2016-02-24 0:14 ` akuster808 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-23 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins > >> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc > >> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). > >> > >> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? > > > > yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. > > Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. > > As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will receive the fixes. How far back do we go in matters like this? Thanks in advance! > (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the > versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line > tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) -- Regards, Darcy --- Darcy Watkins Staff Engineer, Firmware Sierra Wireless 13811 Wireless Way, Richmond, BC Canada, V6V 3A4 [P1] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-23 22:52 ` Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-24 0:14 ` akuster808 2016-02-24 16:38 ` Mark Hatle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: akuster808 @ 2016-02-24 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darcy Watkins, yocto On 02/23/2016 02:52 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins >>>> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >>>> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >>>> >>>> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? >>> >>> yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. >> >> Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. >> >> As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. > > I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will > receive the fixes. Master, 2.0 and 1.8 all have the fixes. How far back do we go in matters like this? 1.7 (dizzy) I plan on doing soon. beyond that I do not know. those are all community supported. - armin > > Thanks in advance! > >> (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the >> versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line >> tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-24 0:14 ` akuster808 @ 2016-02-24 16:38 ` Mark Hatle 2016-02-24 16:50 ` akuster808 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mark Hatle @ 2016-02-24 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On 2/23/16 6:14 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 02/23/2016 02:52 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins >>>>> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >>>>> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >>>>> >>>>> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? >>>> >>>> yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. >>> >>> Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. >>> >>> As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. >> >> I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will >> receive the fixes. > > Master, 2.0 and 1.8 all have the fixes. > How far back do we go in matters like this? Official support is current (in development) and the last two releases. So up to about a year and a half of support. After this point, it becomes community support. This really means, if someone in the community wants to continue support past the YP's support guidelines they are welcome to do so -- but there won't be any official releases, only checkins to the repository. We have done this on some OpenSSL fixes in the past, but it was based on specific requests and people submitting the fixes to be included with older versions. > 1.7 (dizzy) I plan on doing soon. beyond that I do not know. those are > all community supported. > > - armin >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >>> (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the >>> versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line >>> tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-24 16:38 ` Mark Hatle @ 2016-02-24 16:50 ` akuster808 2016-02-26 1:43 ` Darcy Watkins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: akuster808 @ 2016-02-24 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Hatle, yocto On 02/24/2016 08:38 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 2/23/16 6:14 PM, akuster808 wrote: >> >> >> On 02/23/2016 02:52 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>> On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins >>>>>> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >>>>>> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? >>>>> >>>>> yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. >>>> >>>> Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. >>>> >>>> As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. >>> >>> I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will >>> receive the fixes. >> >> Master, 2.0 and 1.8 all have the fixes. >> How far back do we go in matters like this? > > Official support is current (in development) and the last two releases. So up > to about a year and a half of support. > > After this point, it becomes community support. This really means, if someone > in the community wants to continue support past the YP's support guidelines they > are welcome to do so -- but there won't be any official releases, only checkins > to the repository. much better explanation than mine. thanks, Armin > > We have done this on some OpenSSL fixes in the past, but it was based on > specific requests and people submitting the fixes to be included with older > versions. > >> 1.7 (dizzy) I plan on doing soon. beyond that I do not know. those are >> all community supported. >> >> - armin >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>>> (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the >>>> versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line >>>> tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) >>> >>> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-24 16:50 ` akuster808 @ 2016-02-26 1:43 ` Darcy Watkins 2016-02-26 7:52 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-26 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akuster808; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Be careful about rushing out fixes. We are observing regressions in software triggered by changes in glibc behaviour. --- Regards, Darcy Darcy Watkins Staff Engineer, Firmware Sierra Wireless http://sierrawireless.com [M3] > On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:57 AM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 02/24/2016 08:38 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 2/23/16 6:14 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 02/23/2016 02:52 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>>>> On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins >>>>>>> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >>>>>>> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? >>>>>> >>>>>> yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. >>>>> >>>>> Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. >>>>> >>>>> As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. >>>> >>>> I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will >>>> receive the fixes. >>> >>> Master, 2.0 and 1.8 all have the fixes. >>> How far back do we go in matters like this? >> >> Official support is current (in development) and the last two releases. So up >> to about a year and a half of support. >> >> After this point, it becomes community support. This really means, if someone >> in the community wants to continue support past the YP's support guidelines they >> are welcome to do so -- but there won't be any official releases, only checkins >> to the repository. > > much better explanation than mine. > > thanks, > Armin >> >> We have done this on some OpenSSL fixes in the past, but it was based on >> specific requests and people submitting the fixes to be included with older >> versions. >> >>> 1.7 (dizzy) I plan on doing soon. beyond that I do not know. those are >>> all community supported. >>> >>> - armin >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>>> (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the >>>>> versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line >>>>> tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? 2016-02-26 1:43 ` Darcy Watkins @ 2016-02-26 7:52 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-02-26 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darcy Watkins; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2902 bytes --] Can you describe the regressions in some more detail > On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Darcy Watkins <dwatkins@sierrawireless.com> wrote: > > Be careful about rushing out fixes. We are observing regressions in software triggered by changes in glibc behaviour. > > > --- > > Regards, > > Darcy > > Darcy Watkins > Staff Engineer, Firmware > Sierra Wireless > http://sierrawireless.com > [M3] > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:57 AM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 02/24/2016 08:38 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>> On 2/23/16 6:14 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 02/23/2016 02:52 PM, Darcy Watkins wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 13:51 -0800, Mark Hatle wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/23/16 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Darcy Watkins >>>>>>>> CVE-2015-7547 glibc vulnerability has been published as affecting glibc >>>>>>>> since ver 2.9 (fixed in 2.23 and patched in 2.22 and 2.21). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyone know if we need the same security fixes in eglibc? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes you do. Eglibc was nothing but glibc+few fixes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes this affects all eglibc version 2.9 and newer up to glibc 2.23. >>>>>> >>>>>> As far as I'm aware, this affects all Yocto Project versions up to 2.0. >>>>> >>>>> I will be interested in knowing which Yocto Project versions will >>>>> receive the fixes. >>>> >>>> Master, 2.0 and 1.8 all have the fixes. >>>> How far back do we go in matters like this? >>> >>> Official support is current (in development) and the last two releases. So up >>> to about a year and a half of support. >>> >>> After this point, it becomes community support. This really means, if someone >>> in the community wants to continue support past the YP's support guidelines they >>> are welcome to do so -- but there won't be any official releases, only checkins >>> to the repository. >> >> much better explanation than mine. >> >> thanks, >> Armin >>> >>> We have done this on some OpenSSL fixes in the past, but it was based on >>> specific requests and people submitting the fixes to be included with older >>> versions. >>> >>>> 1.7 (dizzy) I plan on doing soon. beyond that I do not know. those are >>>> all community supported. >>>> >>>> - armin >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>> >>>>>> (The patch referenced by the security announcement applies to all of the >>>>>> versions of glibc I've needed to apply it to for my customers. A few per-line >>>>>> tweaks might be necessary, but it was fairly easy.) >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-26 7:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-02-23 19:25 Does CVE-2015-7547 affect eglibc? Darcy Watkins 2016-02-23 19:53 ` Khem Raj 2016-02-23 21:51 ` Mark Hatle 2016-02-23 22:52 ` Darcy Watkins 2016-02-24 0:14 ` akuster808 2016-02-24 16:38 ` Mark Hatle 2016-02-24 16:50 ` akuster808 2016-02-26 1:43 ` Darcy Watkins 2016-02-26 7:52 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.