From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <mranostay-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c_check_functionality and error code
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:42:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CE15BD.3070800@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160221225606.GA1386@katana>
On 21/02/16 22:56, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Hohum. Wolfram what do you think?
>
> I'd go for "EOPNOTSUPP" since it is most descriptive. I wouldn't say we
> really need to fix it up in the kernel tree. However, I neither would
> vote against it.
>
I'm certainly keen on cleaning this up in IIO at the least.
A bit of consistency is always nice and once we have done it once
it should be reasonably pain free.
Anyhow, patches welcome ;)
Jonathan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c_check_functionality and error code
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:42:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CE15BD.3070800@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160221225606.GA1386@katana>
On 21/02/16 22:56, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Hohum. Wolfram what do you think?
>
> I'd go for "EOPNOTSUPP" since it is most descriptive. I wouldn't say we
> really need to fix it up in the kernel tree. However, I neither would
> vote against it.
>
I'm certainly keen on cleaning this up in IIO at the least.
A bit of consistency is always nice and once we have done it once
it should be reasonably pain free.
Anyhow, patches welcome ;)
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 23:09 [RFC] i2c_check_functionality and error code Matt Ranostay
[not found] ` <CAKzfze-B4dx9aghERaRDu7xz0i6pMJcAUGMQX7OWJpWh7i=bxw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-21 20:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-02-21 20:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <56CA1F0D.2060707-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-21 22:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-02-21 22:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-02-24 20:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2016-02-24 20:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CE15BD.3070800@kernel.org \
--to=jic23-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mranostay-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.