From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: at91/dt: shdwc binding: add new shutdown controller documentation
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD90D3.1000102@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151003170220.GG2694@piout.net>
Le 03/10/2015 19:02, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit :
> On 30/09/2015 at 18:22:00 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
>> +SHDWC Shutdown Controller (Alternative)
>> +
>> +1) shdwc node
>> +
>> +required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "atmel,sama5d2-shdwc".
>> +- reg: should contain registers location and length
>> +- clocks: phandle to input clock.
>> +- #address-cells: should be one. The cell is the wake-up input index.
>> +- #size-cells: should be zero.
>> +
>> +optional properties:
>> +
>> +- atmel,wakeup-debouncer: minimum wake-up inputs debouncer period in
>
> Shouldn't that property be called atmel,wakeup-debouncer-ms ?
Well, as it's microseconds, it should be "-us", according to the file:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/property-units.txt.
Reworking on this I realised that a kind "generic" property exists for
this type: "debounce-delay-ms", without a vendor prefix.
So, for the DT people, what do you think if I change my private property
to this one that seems to be used in a bunch of bindings already in its
milliseconds variant:
gpio-matrix-keypad.txt, tc3589x.txt, extcon-palmas.txt or with a vendor
prefix in nvidia,tegra20-kbc.txt or lpc32xx-key.txt
and if I diversify it to a "debounce-delay-us" variant and use it in
this driver?
>> +
>> +2) input nodes
>> +
>> +Wake-up input nodes are usually described in the "board" part of the Device
>> +Tree. Note also that input 0 is linked to the wake-up pin and is frequently
>> +used.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- reg: should contain the wake-up input index [0 - 15].
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- atmel,wakeup-type: string, operation mode of the input described by the child
>> + node. Supported values are: "high" or "low".
>> +
>
> Maybe we could avoid parsing string and use an integer with a few defines
Yes, even a boolean should do the trick. What about:
- atmel,wakeup-active-high: boolean, the corresponding wake-up
input described by the child, forces the wake-up of the core power
supply on a high level. The default is to be active low.
Thanks for your insights. Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <sre@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: at91/dt: shdwc binding: add new shutdown controller documentation
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD90D3.1000102@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151003170220.GG2694@piout.net>
Le 03/10/2015 19:02, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 30/09/2015 at 18:22:00 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
>> +SHDWC Shutdown Controller (Alternative)
>> +
>> +1) shdwc node
>> +
>> +required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "atmel,sama5d2-shdwc".
>> +- reg: should contain registers location and length
>> +- clocks: phandle to input clock.
>> +- #address-cells: should be one. The cell is the wake-up input index.
>> +- #size-cells: should be zero.
>> +
>> +optional properties:
>> +
>> +- atmel,wakeup-debouncer: minimum wake-up inputs debouncer period in
>
> Shouldn't that property be called atmel,wakeup-debouncer-ms ?
Well, as it's microseconds, it should be "-us", according to the file:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/property-units.txt.
Reworking on this I realised that a kind "generic" property exists for
this type: "debounce-delay-ms", without a vendor prefix.
So, for the DT people, what do you think if I change my private property
to this one that seems to be used in a bunch of bindings already in its
milliseconds variant:
gpio-matrix-keypad.txt, tc3589x.txt, extcon-palmas.txt or with a vendor
prefix in nvidia,tegra20-kbc.txt or lpc32xx-key.txt
and if I diversify it to a "debounce-delay-us" variant and use it in
this driver?
>> +
>> +2) input nodes
>> +
>> +Wake-up input nodes are usually described in the "board" part of the Device
>> +Tree. Note also that input 0 is linked to the wake-up pin and is frequently
>> +used.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- reg: should contain the wake-up input index [0 - 15].
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- atmel,wakeup-type: string, operation mode of the input described by the child
>> + node. Supported values are: "high" or "low".
>> +
>
> Maybe we could avoid parsing string and use an integer with a few defines
Yes, even a boolean should do the trick. What about:
- atmel,wakeup-active-high: boolean, the corresponding wake-up
input described by the child, forces the wake-up of the core power
supply on a high level. The default is to be active low.
Thanks for your insights. Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 16:21 [PATCH v3 0/2] power: reset: support for Atmel alternative Shutdown Controller Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: at91/dt: shdwc binding: add new shutdown controller documentation Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:22 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-03 17:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-10-03 17:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-07 14:31 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2016-03-07 14:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] power: reset: at91-shdwc: add new shutdown controller driver Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:22 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-09-30 16:45 ` kbuild test robot
2015-09-30 16:45 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-01 15:12 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-01 15:12 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DD90D3.1000102@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.