All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, bp@alien8.de,
	gleb@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wei@redhat.com, sherry.hurwitz@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:41:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DDAF2D.3060703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457124368-2025-6-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>



On 04/03/2016 21:46, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:

> @@ -162,6 +170,37 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
>  
>  	/* cached guest cpuid flags for faster access */
>  	bool nrips_enabled	: 1;
> +
> +	struct page *avic_bk_page;
> +	void *in_kernel_lapic_regs;
> +};
> +
> +struct __attribute__ ((__packed__))
> +svm_avic_log_ait_entry {
> +	u32 guest_phy_apic_id	: 8,
> +	    res			: 23,
> +	    valid		: 1;
> +};
> +
> +struct __attribute__ ((__packed__))
> +svm_avic_phy_ait_entry {
> +	u64 host_phy_apic_id	: 8,
> +	    res1		: 4,
> +	    bk_pg_ptr		: 40,
> +	    res2		: 10,
> +	    is_running		: 1,
> +	    valid		: 1;
> +};

Please don't use bitfields.

> +/* Note: This structure is per VM */
> +struct svm_vm_data {
> +	atomic_t count;
> +	u32 ldr_mode;
> +	u32 avic_max_vcpu_id;
> +	u32 avic_tag;
> +
> +	struct page *avic_log_ait_page;
> +	struct page *avic_phy_ait_page;

You can put these directly in kvm_arch.  Do not use abbreviations:

	struct page *avic_logical_apic_id_table_page;
	struct page *avic_physical_apic_id_table_page;

> @@ -1000,6 +1057,41 @@ static void svm_adjust_tsc_offset_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 adjustment)
>  	mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_INTERCEPTS);
>  }
>  
> +static void avic_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> +{
> +	void *vapic_bkpg;
> +	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = svm->vcpu.kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +	phys_addr_t bpa = PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(svm->avic_bk_page));
> +	phys_addr_t lpa = PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(vm_data->avic_log_ait_page));
> +	phys_addr_t ppa = PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(vm_data->avic_phy_ait_page));

Please use page_to_phys.

> +	if (!vmcb)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: bpa=%#llx, lpa=%#llx, ppa=%#llx\n",
> +		 __func__, (unsigned long long)bpa,
> +		 (unsigned long long)lpa, (unsigned long long)ppa);

No pr_debug.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Here we copy the value from the emulated LAPIC register
> +	 * to the vAPIC backign page, and then flip regs frame.
> +	 */
> +	if (!svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs)
> +		svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs = svm->vcpu.arch.apic->regs;
> +
> +	vapic_bkpg = pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(svm->avic_bk_page));

Please use kmap instead.

> +	memcpy(vapic_bkpg, svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	svm->vcpu.arch.apic->regs = vapic_bkpg;

Can you explain the flipping logic, and why you cannot just use the
existing apic.regs?

> +	vmcb->control.avic_bk_page = bpa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;

No abbreviations ("avic_backing_page").

> +	vmcb->control.avic_log_apic_id = lpa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;
> +	vmcb->control.avic_phy_apic_id = ppa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;
> +	vmcb->control.avic_phy_apic_id |= AVIC_PHY_APIC_ID_MAX;
> +	vmcb->control.avic_enable = 1;
> +}
> +
>  static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
>  	struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
> @@ -1113,6 +1205,293 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  	mark_all_dirty(svm->vmcb);
>  
>  	enable_gif(svm);
> +
> +	if (avic)
> +		avic_init_vmcb(svm);
> +}
> +
> +static struct svm_avic_phy_ait_entry *
> +avic_get_phy_ait_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int index)
> +{
> +	struct svm_avic_phy_ait_entry *avic_phy_ait;
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = vcpu->kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +
> +	if (!vm_data)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/* Note: APIC ID = 0xff is used for broadcast.
> +	 *       APIC ID > 0xff is reserved.
> +	 */
> +	if (index >= 0xff)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	avic_phy_ait = page_address(vm_data->avic_phy_ait_page);
> +
> +	return &avic_phy_ait[index];
> +}
> +
> +struct svm_avic_log_ait_entry *
> +avic_get_log_ait_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 mda, bool is_flat)
> +{
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = vcpu->kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +	int index;
> +	struct svm_avic_log_ait_entry *avic_log_ait;
> +
> +	if (!vm_data)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (is_flat) { /* flat */
> +		if (mda > 7)
> +			return NULL;
> +		index = mda;
> +	} else { /* cluster */
> +		int apic_id = mda & 0xf;
> +		int cluster_id = (mda & 0xf0) >> 8;
> +
> +		if (apic_id > 4 || cluster_id >= 0xf)
> +			return NULL;
> +		index = (cluster_id << 2) + apic_id;
> +	}
> +	avic_log_ait = (struct svm_avic_log_ait_entry *)
> +				page_address(vm_data->avic_log_ait_page);
> +
> +	return &avic_log_ait[index];
> +}

Instead of these functions, create a complete function to handle APIC_ID
and APIC_LDR writes.  Then use kmap/kunmap instead of page_address.

> +static inline void
> +avic_set_bk_page_entry(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int reg_off, u32 val)
> +{
> +	void *avic_bk = page_address(svm->avic_bk_page);
> +
> +	*((u32 *) (avic_bk + reg_off)) = val;
> +}

Unused function.

> +static inline u32 *avic_get_bk_page_entry(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u32 offset)
> +{
> +	char *tmp = (char *)page_address(svm->avic_bk_page);
> +
> +	return (u32 *)(tmp+offset);
> +}

I think you should be able to use kvm_apic_get_reg instead.

> +static int avic_init_bk_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

No abbreviations (but again, please try reusing apic.regs).

> +static int avic_alloc_bk_page(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int id)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0, i;
> +	bool realloc = false;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = svm->vcpu.kvm;
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +
> +	/* Check if we have already allocated vAPIC backing
> +	 * page for this vCPU. If not, we need to realloc
> +	 * a new one and re-assign all other vCPU.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm->arch.apic_access_page_done &&
> +	    (id > vm_data->avic_max_vcpu_id)) {
> +		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> +			avic_unalloc_bk_page(vcpu);
> +
> +		__x86_set_memory_region(kvm, APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT,
> +					0, 0);
> +		realloc = true;
> +		vm_data->avic_max_vcpu_id = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We are allocating vAPIC backing page
> +	 * upto the max vCPU ID
> +	 */
> +	if (id >= vm_data->avic_max_vcpu_id) {
> +		ret = __x86_set_memory_region(kvm,
> +					      APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT,
> +					      APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE,
> +					      PAGE_SIZE * (id + 1));

Why is this necessary?  The APIC access page is a peculiarity of Intel
processors (and the special memslot for only needs to map 0xfee00000 to
0xfee00fff; after that there is the MSI area).

> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		vm_data->avic_max_vcpu_id = id;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Reinit vAPIC backing page for exisinting vcpus */
> +	if (realloc)
> +		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> +			avic_init_bk_page(vcpu);

Why is this necessary?

> +	avic_init_bk_page(&svm->vcpu);
> +
> +	kvm->arch.apic_access_page_done = true;
> +
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void avic_vm_uninit(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +
> +	if (!vm_data)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (vm_data->avic_log_ait_page)
> +		__free_page(vm_data->avic_log_ait_page);
> +	if (vm_data->avic_phy_ait_page)
> +		__free_page(vm_data->avic_phy_ait_page);
> +	kfree(vm_data);
> +	kvm->arch.arch_data = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void avic_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = vcpu->kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +
> +	if (!avic)
> +		return;
> +
> +	avic_unalloc_bk_page(vcpu);
> +	svm->vcpu.arch.apic->regs = svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs;
> +	svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs = NULL;
> +
> +	if (vm_data &&
> +	    (atomic_read(&vm_data->count) == 0 ||
> +	     atomic_dec_and_test(&vm_data->count)))
> +		avic_vm_uninit(vcpu->kvm);

Add a new kvm_x86_ops callback .free_vcpus and call it from
kvm_free_vcpus; then count is not necessary.

We probably should use it for Intel too.  The calls to
x86_set_memory_region in kvm_arch_destroy_vm are hideous.

> +}
> +
> +static atomic_t avic_tag_gen = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
> +
> +static inline u32 avic_get_next_tag(void)
> +{
> +	u32 tag = atomic_read(&avic_tag_gen);
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&avic_tag_gen);
> +	return tag;
> +}
> +
> +static int avic_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	int err = -ENOMEM;
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data;
> +	struct page *avic_phy_ait_page;
> +	struct page *avic_log_ait_page;

This is probably also best moved to a new callback .init_vm (called from
kvm_arch_init_vm).

> +	vm_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct svm_vm_data),
> +				      GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vm_data)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	kvm->arch.arch_data = vm_data;
> +	atomic_set(&vm_data->count, 0);
> +
> +	/* Allocating physical APIC ID table (4KB) */
> +	avic_phy_ait_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!avic_phy_ait_page)
> +		goto free_avic;
> +
> +	vm_data->avic_phy_ait_page = avic_phy_ait_page;
> +	clear_page(page_address(avic_phy_ait_page));

You can use get_zeroed_page and free_page, instead of
alloc_page/clear_page/__free_page.

Thanks,

Paolo

> +	/* Allocating logical APIC ID table (4KB) */
> +	avic_log_ait_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!avic_log_ait_page)
> +		goto free_avic;
> +
> +	vm_data->avic_log_ait_page = avic_log_ait_page;
> +	clear_page(page_address(avic_log_ait_page));
> +
> +	vm_data->avic_tag = avic_get_next_tag();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +free_avic:
> +	avic_vm_uninit(kvm);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int avic_vcpu_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct vcpu_svm *svm, int id)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	struct svm_vm_data *vm_data = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Note: svm_vm_data is per VM */
> +	if (!kvm->arch.arch_data) {
> +		err = avic_vm_init(kvm);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = avic_alloc_bk_page(svm, id);
> +	if (err) {
> +		avic_vcpu_uninit(&svm->vcpu);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	vm_data = kvm->arch.arch_data;
> +	atomic_inc(&vm_data->count);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> @@ -1131,6 +1510,9 @@ static void svm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  
>  	kvm_cpuid(vcpu, &eax, &dummy, &dummy, &dummy);
>  	kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX, eax);
> +
> +	if (avic && !init_event)
> +		avic_update_vapic_bar(svm, APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE);
>  }
>  
>  static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
> @@ -1169,6 +1551,12 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>  	if (!hsave_page)
>  		goto free_page3;
>  
> +	if (avic) {
> +		err = avic_vcpu_init(kvm, svm, id);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto free_page4;
> +	}
> +
>  	svm->nested.hsave = page_address(hsave_page);
>  
>  	svm->msrpm = page_address(msrpm_pages);
> @@ -1187,6 +1575,8 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>  
>  	return &svm->vcpu;
>  
> +free_page4:
> +	__free_page(hsave_page);
>  free_page3:
>  	__free_pages(nested_msrpm_pages, MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
>  free_page2:
> @@ -1209,6 +1599,7 @@ static void svm_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	__free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
>  	__free_page(virt_to_page(svm->nested.hsave));
>  	__free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->nested.msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
> +	avic_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
>  	kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
>  	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
>  }
> @@ -3382,6 +3773,7 @@ static void dump_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	pr_err("%-20s%08x\n", "exit_int_info_err:", control->exit_int_info_err);
>  	pr_err("%-20s%lld\n", "nested_ctl:", control->nested_ctl);
>  	pr_err("%-20s%016llx\n", "nested_cr3:", control->nested_cr3);
> +	pr_err("%-20s%016llx\n", "avic_vapic_bar:", control->avic_vapic_bar);
>  	pr_err("%-20s%08x\n", "event_inj:", control->event_inj);
>  	pr_err("%-20s%08x\n", "event_inj_err:", control->event_inj_err);
>  	pr_err("%-20s%lld\n", "lbr_ctl:", control->lbr_ctl);
> @@ -3613,11 +4005,31 @@ static void svm_set_virtual_x2apic_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool set)
>  
>  static bool svm_get_enable_apicv(void)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return avic;
> +}
> +
> +static void svm_hwapic_irr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr)
> +{
>  }
>  
> +static void svm_hwapic_isr_update(struct kvm *kvm, int isr)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/* Note: Currently only used by Hyper-V. */
>  static void svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
> +
> +	if (!avic)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs)
> +		return;
> +
> +	svm->vcpu.arch.apic->regs = svm->in_kernel_lapic_regs;
> +	vmcb->control.avic_enable = 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
> @@ -4387,6 +4799,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
>  	.refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl = svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl,
>  	.load_eoi_exitmap = svm_load_eoi_exitmap,
>  	.sync_pir_to_irr = svm_sync_pir_to_irr,
> +	.hwapic_irr_update = svm_hwapic_irr_update,
> +	.hwapic_isr_update = svm_hwapic_isr_update,
>  
>  	.set_tss_addr = svm_set_tss_addr,
>  	.get_tdp_level = get_npt_level,
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-07 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-04 20:45 [PART1 RFC v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:45 ` [PART1 RFC v2 01/10] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to exposes helper functions Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  6:19     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 03/10] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  7:41     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-15 12:51         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 04/10] svm: clean up V_TPR, V_IRQ, V_INTR_PRIO, and V_INTR_MASKING Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 16:41   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-15 17:09     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-15 17:22       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-16  6:22         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-16  7:20           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-16  8:21             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-16 11:12               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 06/10] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 21:54     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-09 11:10       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 16:00         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14  9:41           ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:27             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  9:50         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14  5:25     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14  8:54       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 07/10] svm: Add VMEXIT handlers for AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:58   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 22:05     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-09 10:56       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 20:55   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 19:34     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 19:54       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 20:44         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-17  3:58     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-17  9:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-17 19:44     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-17 20:27       ` [PATCH] KVM: split kvm_vcpu_wake_up from kvm_vcpu_kick Radim Krčmář
2016-03-18  5:13         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 08/10] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 09/10] svm: Do not intercept CR8 " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-07 15:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-14  6:09     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 12:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-04 20:46 ` [PART1 RFC v2 10/10] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-09 21:46   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-10 14:01     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14 11:58       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 16:54         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-14 11:48     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-14 16:40       ` Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56DDAF2D.3060703@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.