From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mmotm broken on arm with ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:27:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DE2A92.5010806@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
I just tried the master of mmotm and ran into compilation issues on arm:
CC arch/arm/mm/mmu.o
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:737:37: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
void *(*alloc)(unsigned long sz))
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:738:1: error: expected ?=?, ?,?, ?;?, ?asm? or ?__attribute__? before ?{? token
{
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ?early_pte_alloc?:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:47: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: error: ?pte_alloc? undeclared (first use in this function)
return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ?alloc_init_pte?:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:56: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:15: error: ?pte_alloc? undeclared (first use in this function)
pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ?early_pte_alloc?:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:751:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
It looks like this is caused by ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces)
which added
#define pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address) \
(unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address))
and conflicts with arch/arm/mm/mmu.c which is using pte_alloc as a function name.
Is this a known issue? If not, Russell would you take a patch to rename the pte_alloc
functions in arm?
Thanks,
Laura
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: mmotm broken on arm with ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:27:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DE2A92.5010806@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
I just tried the master of mmotm and ran into compilation issues on arm:
CC arch/arm/mm/mmu.o
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:737:37: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
void *(*alloc)(unsigned long sz))
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:738:1: error: expected a??=a??, a??,a??, a??;a??, a??asma?? or a??__attribute__a?? before a??{a?? token
{
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function a??early_pte_alloca??:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:47: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: error: a??pte_alloca?? undeclared (first use in this function)
return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function a??alloc_init_ptea??:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:56: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:15: error: a??pte_alloca?? undeclared (first use in this function)
pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc);
^
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function a??early_pte_alloca??:
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:751:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
It looks like this is caused by ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces)
which added
#define pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address) \
(unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address))
and conflicts with arch/arm/mm/mmu.c which is using pte_alloc as a function name.
Is this a known issue? If not, Russell would you take a patch to rename the pte_alloc
functions in arm?
Thanks,
Laura
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 1:27 Laura Abbott [this message]
2016-03-08 1:27 ` mmotm broken on arm with ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces) Laura Abbott
2016-03-08 2:02 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-08 2:02 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-08 19:34 ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-08 19:34 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DE2A92.5010806@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.