From: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"Tao Huang" <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
elaine.zhang@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:51:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF7393.4020600@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VhMY=YO7zVYeP-+LY0gPvQ8yjaAUEGVJrMGLwbGjqVmg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Doug:
在 09/03/2016 07:34, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Xing Zheng,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
>
> Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
> for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
> sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
> of you it doesn't compile.
>
> I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
>
> 8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
> 8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
> 8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
>
> 8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
> new pll sources
> 8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
> clock providers
> 8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
> and similar socs
> 8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
> 8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
>
>
> Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
> SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
> on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
> latest patch series from March 1st
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
> #defines.
>
> Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
> they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
>
ok, we will upload dtsi later after the clk-rk3399 driver been applied.
xing will send the patches for rk3399 together.
We hope the dtsi could be applied first but depends on clk driver, but
it seems
not a good idea, we will resend dtsi patch after more drivers are applied.
Thanks Doug.
> Thanks!
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Xing Zheng <zhengxing-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Tao Huang" <huangtao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Michael Turquette"
<mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
elaine.zhang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
linux-clk <linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:51:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF7393.4020600@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VhMY=YO7zVYeP-+LY0gPvQ8yjaAUEGVJrMGLwbGjqVmg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi Doug:
在 09/03/2016 07:34, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Xing Zheng,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
>
> Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
> for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
> sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
> of you it doesn't compile.
>
> I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
>
> 8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
> 8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
> 8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
>
> 8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
> new pll sources
> 8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
> clock providers
> 8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
> and similar socs
> 8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
> 8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
>
>
> Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
> SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
> on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
> latest patch series from March 1st
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
> #defines.
>
> Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
> they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
>
ok, we will upload dtsi later after the clk-rk3399 driver been applied.
xing will send the patches for rk3399 together.
We hope the dtsi could be applied first but depends on clk driver, but
it seems
not a good idea, we will resend dtsi patch after more drivers are applied.
Thanks Doug.
> Thanks!
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jay.xu@rock-chips.com (Jianqun Xu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:51:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF7393.4020600@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VhMY=YO7zVYeP-+LY0gPvQ8yjaAUEGVJrMGLwbGjqVmg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Doug:
? 09/03/2016 07:34, Doug Anderson ??:
> Xing Zheng,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
>
> Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
> for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
> sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
> of you it doesn't compile.
>
> I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
>
> 8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
> 8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
> 8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
>
> 8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
> new pll sources
> 8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
> clock providers
> 8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
> and similar socs
> 8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
> 8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
>
>
> Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
> SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
> on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
> latest patch series from March 1st
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
> #defines.
>
> Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
> they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
>
ok, we will upload dtsi later after the clk-rk3399 driver been applied.
xing will send the patches for rk3399 together.
We hope the dtsi could be applied first but depends on clk driver, but
it seems
not a good idea, we will resend dtsi patch after more drivers are applied.
Thanks Doug.
> Thanks!
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 10:14 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Add more clock compatible features and support the RK3399 clock Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for new pll sources Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-09 1:12 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 1:12 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 1:12 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 1:12 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-01 10:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple clock providers Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399 and similar socs Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-09 1:22 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 1:22 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 1:22 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-09 2:20 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-09 2:20 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:14 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:15 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399 Xing Zheng
2016-03-01 10:15 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-08 23:34 ` Doug Anderson
2016-03-08 23:34 ` Doug Anderson
2016-03-09 0:51 ` Jianqun Xu [this message]
2016-03-09 0:51 ` Jianqun Xu
2016-03-09 0:51 ` Jianqun Xu
2016-03-09 1:26 ` Xing Zheng
2016-03-09 1:26 ` Xing Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DF7393.4020600@rock-chips.com \
--to=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=elaine.zhang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=zhengxing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.