Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/14] Net patches

[Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 03/09/2016 12:26 PM, Li Zhijian wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/09/2016 09:36 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 05:54 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:06, Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>> I found the reason for this problem is that
>>>> unix_connect() have not connect to sock_path before iov_send().
>>>> It need time to establish connection. so can we fix it with usleep()
>>>> like this:
>>>>
>>>>      recv_sock = unix_connect(sock_path, NULL);
>>>>      g_assert_cmpint(recv_sock, !=, -1);
>>>> +    usleep(1000);
>>>>
>>>>      ret = iov_send(send_sock[0], iov, 2, 0, sizeof(size) +
>>>> sizeof(send_buf));
>>>>      g_assert_cmpint(ret, ==, sizeof(send_buf) + sizeof(size));
>>>>      close(send_sock[0]);
>>>>
>>>>      ret = qemu_recv(recv_sock, &len, sizeof(len), 0);
>>>
>>> I would prefer it if we could find a way to fix this race
>>> reliably rather than just inserting a delay and hoping it
>>> is sufficient. Otherwise the test is likely to be unreliable
>>> if run on a heavily loaded or slow machine.
>>
>> Yes, but there is no way to know when tcp_chr_accept() is called. Add a event
>> to notify it?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
> 
> Hi, Jason, PMM
> As Congyang said that this is a bug of testcase instead of filter-mirror.
> Maybe we should re-wrok the testcase, for example
> - using -chardev pipe instead of -chardev socket, because we are
>   intend to test the packet mirror fuction instead of -chardev socket

I think it is OK to change it.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> How about that ?
> 
> 
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> -- PMM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> .
>