All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Linaro UEFI Mailman List <linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:10:54 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DFDA8E.3090503@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADyBb7uK9aGuBDCvG_Yv9BJwTx9uvbzxajkv-Hy8BibR3W=J+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 08/03/2016 23:37, Fu Wei wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 14:54, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
> So speaking of loading additional modules/lack of initrd on ARM, I thinks that
> will (only) affect loading XSM.
> For this, I have discussed of that with Julien, I think :
> (1) the first module must be kernel
> (2) the second module must be initrd, if we have initrd
> (3) Start from the 2nd module, XEN will detect that if the module is a XSM by
> the XSM binary signature. if we get XSM as the second module, that
> means we have not initrd.

We need to update Xen for point (3). Fu Wei, could you send a patch for 
this?

> please correct me if I misunderstand it

I'm fine with this plan, it matches the x86 behavior.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Linaro UEFI Mailman List <linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:10:54 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DFDA8E.3090503@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADyBb7uK9aGuBDCvG_Yv9BJwTx9uvbzxajkv-Hy8BibR3W=J+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 08/03/2016 23:37, Fu Wei wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 14:54, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
> So speaking of loading additional modules/lack of initrd on ARM, I thinks that
> will (only) affect loading XSM.
> For this, I have discussed of that with Julien, I think :
> (1) the first module must be kernel
> (2) the second module must be initrd, if we have initrd
> (3) Start from the 2nd module, XEN will detect that if the module is a XSM by
> the XSM binary signature. if we get XSM as the second module, that
> means we have not initrd.

We need to update Xen for point (3). Fu Wei, could you send a patch for 
this?

> please correct me if I misunderstand it

I'm fine with this plan, it matches the x86 behavior.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-26 11:13 [PATCH v3 0/4] arm64,xen: add xen_boot support into grup-mkconfig fu.wei
2016-02-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] i386, xen: Add xen_hypervisor and xen_module aliases for i386 fu.wei
2016-02-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: add "--nounzip" option support in xen_module command fu.wei
2016-02-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] * util/grub.d/20_linux_xen.in: Add xen_boot command support fu.wei
2016-02-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi fu.wei
2016-02-27 17:26   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-27 17:26     ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-27 17:44     ` Fu Wei
2016-02-27 17:44       ` Fu Wei
2016-03-07  8:22       ` Fu Wei
2016-03-07  8:22         ` Fu Wei
2016-03-08  7:54         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-03-08  7:54           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-03-08 16:37           ` Fu Wei
2016-03-08 16:37             ` Fu Wei
2016-03-08 17:09             ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-03-08 17:09               ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-03-09  8:10             ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-03-09  8:10               ` Julien Grall
2016-03-09  8:22               ` [Xen-devel] " Fu Wei
2016-03-18  7:53                 ` Fu Wei
2016-04-13  9:56                   ` Fu Wei
2016-04-13  9:56                     ` Fu Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56DFDA8E.3090503@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
    --cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=phcoder@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.