All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: fix ept=0/pte.u=0/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0 combo
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:26:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E167DE.4090602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E16527.4020908@linux.intel.com>



On 10/03/2016 13:14, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> More precisely, ignore_bits is only needed if guest EFER.NX=0 and we're
>> not in this CR0.WP=1/CR4.SMEP=0 situation.  In theory you could have
>> guest EFER.NX=1 and host EFER.NX=0.
> 
> It is not in linux, the kernel always set EFER.NX if CPUID reports it,
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:
> 
> 204         /* Setup EFER (Extended Feature Enable Register) */
> 205         movl    $MSR_EFER, %ecx
> 206         rdmsr
> 207         btsl    $_EFER_SCE, %eax        /* Enable System Call */
> 208         btl     $20,%edi                /* No Execute supported? */
> 209         jnc     1f
> 210         btsl    $_EFER_NX, %eax
> 211         btsq    $_PAGE_BIT_NX,early_pmd_flags(%rip)
> 212 1:      wrmsr                           /* Make changes effective */
> 
> So if guest sees NX in its cpuid then host EFER.NX should be 1.

You're right.  It's just in theory.  But ignoring EFER.NX when it is 1
is technically not correct; since we have to add some special EFER_NX
logic anyway, I preferred to make it pedantically right. :)

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 11:44 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: MMU: fix ept=0/pte.u=0/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0 Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: fix ept=0/pte.u=0/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0 combo Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10  8:27   ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 10:01     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 10:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 12:14       ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 12:26         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-10  8:46   ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 10:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: MMU: fix reserved bit check for pte.u=0/pte.w=0/CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0 Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10  8:36   ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 10:02     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E167DE.4090602@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.