From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: khilman@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: davinci: fix unwinding in probe
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:40:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7D198.4050900@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457996081-21975-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 04:24 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> Unwiding from an error in davinci_mmcsd_probe was a mess. Some errors were
> not handled and not all paths unwound correctly. Also using devm_ where
> possible to simplify things.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
>
> v2 changes: use devm_ where possible
>
> drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index a294d261..6dd9562 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mmc_davinci_host *host = NULL;
> struct mmc_host *mmc = NULL;
> struct resource *r, *mem = NULL;
> - int ret = 0, irq = 0;
> + int ret, irq;
> size_t mem_size;
> const struct platform_device_id *id_entry;
>
> @@ -1233,22 +1233,20 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (!r || irq == NO_IRQ)
> - goto out;
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> mem_size = resource_size(r);
> - mem = request_mem_region(r->start, mem_size, pdev->name);
> + mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, r->start, mem_size,
> + pdev->name);
> if (!mem)
> - goto out;
> + return -EBUSY;
>
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct mmc_davinci_host), &pdev->dev);
> if (!mmc)
> - goto out;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
This should be 'return -ENOMEM' you dont want to proceed further if this
fails.
Other than that, looks fine to me.
Regards,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: davinci: fix unwinding in probe
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:40:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7D198.4050900@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457996081-21975-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 04:24 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> Unwiding from an error in davinci_mmcsd_probe was a mess. Some errors were
> not handled and not all paths unwound correctly. Also using devm_ where
> possible to simplify things.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
>
> v2 changes: use devm_ where possible
>
> drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index a294d261..6dd9562 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mmc_davinci_host *host = NULL;
> struct mmc_host *mmc = NULL;
> struct resource *r, *mem = NULL;
> - int ret = 0, irq = 0;
> + int ret, irq;
> size_t mem_size;
> const struct platform_device_id *id_entry;
>
> @@ -1233,22 +1233,20 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (!r || irq == NO_IRQ)
> - goto out;
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> mem_size = resource_size(r);
> - mem = request_mem_region(r->start, mem_size, pdev->name);
> + mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, r->start, mem_size,
> + pdev->name);
> if (!mem)
> - goto out;
> + return -EBUSY;
>
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct mmc_davinci_host), &pdev->dev);
> if (!mmc)
> - goto out;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
This should be 'return -ENOMEM' you dont want to proceed further if this
fails.
Other than that, looks fine to me.
Regards,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: <khilman@kernel.org>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: davinci: fix unwinding in probe
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:40:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7D198.4050900@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457996081-21975-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 04:24 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> Unwiding from an error in davinci_mmcsd_probe was a mess. Some errors were
> not handled and not all paths unwound correctly. Also using devm_ where
> possible to simplify things.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
>
> v2 changes: use devm_ where possible
>
> drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index a294d261..6dd9562 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mmc_davinci_host *host = NULL;
> struct mmc_host *mmc = NULL;
> struct resource *r, *mem = NULL;
> - int ret = 0, irq = 0;
> + int ret, irq;
> size_t mem_size;
> const struct platform_device_id *id_entry;
>
> @@ -1233,22 +1233,20 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (!r || irq == NO_IRQ)
> - goto out;
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> mem_size = resource_size(r);
> - mem = request_mem_region(r->start, mem_size, pdev->name);
> + mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, r->start, mem_size,
> + pdev->name);
> if (!mem)
> - goto out;
> + return -EBUSY;
>
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct mmc_davinci_host), &pdev->dev);
> if (!mmc)
> - goto out;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
This should be 'return -ENOMEM' you dont want to proceed further if this
fails.
Other than that, looks fine to me.
Regards,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 23:50 [PATCH 0/4] davinci_mmc device tree fixes David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: davinci: remove matching string David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 13:41 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 13:41 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-09 23:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] mmc: davinci: fix unwinding in probe David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 11:52 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 11:52 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-09 23:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmc: davinci: prepare clock David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 11:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 11:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 17:09 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 17:09 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 17:13 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 17:13 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 5:16 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 5:16 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-09 23:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] mmc: davinci: suppress waring when using DT David Lechner
2016-03-09 23:50 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 13:41 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 13:41 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] davinci_mmc fixes David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: davinci: remove matching string David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 9:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 9:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 9:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: davinci: fix unwinding in probe David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 9:10 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2016-03-15 9:10 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 9:10 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: davinci: prepare clock David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 9:13 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 9:13 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 9:13 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: davinci: don't use dma platform resources David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 8:09 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:09 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:09 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:54 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 8:54 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 8:54 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 8:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 8:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 8:56 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-15 17:14 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 17:14 ` David Lechner
2016-03-16 8:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-16 8:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-16 8:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-03-14 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm: davinci: remove mmc dma resources David Lechner
2016-03-14 22:54 ` David Lechner
2016-03-15 8:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] davinci_mmc fixes Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:13 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-03-15 8:13 ` Sekhar Nori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E7D198.4050900@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.