Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v4 0/4] Add ASPEED AST2400 SoC and OpenPower BMC machine

["Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>]

On 03/15/2016 06:01 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 12:34 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>>> This patch series models enough of the ASPEED AST2400 ARM9 SoC[0] to
>>> boot an aspeed_defconfig Linux kernel[1][2]. Specifically, the series
>>> implements the ASPEED timer and VIC devices, integrates them into an
>>> AST2400 SoC and exposes it all through a new opbmc2400 machine. The
>>> device model patches only partially implement the hardware features of
>>> the timer and VIC, again mostly just enough to boot Linux.
>>
>> Awesome! Nice to have these patches escaping the lab :)
>>
>> In terms of naming suggestions: I think this depends on what we're
>> looking to emulate here. I see two options:
>>
>> The qemu platform becomes a "reference" for OpenPOWER bmc hardware, but
>> doesn't necessarily align with an actual machine. In that case,
>> something generic like opbmc- would make sense.
>>
>> On the other hand, if we'd like to create qemu platforms that represent
>> actual machines (eg, the OpenPOWER "palmetto" machine), then
>> -bmc would seem more appropriate. In this case, the machine
>> name would be palmetto-bmc. No need to include the SoC name in that, as
>> it's defined by the hardware implementation.
>>
>> I think the latter option may be more generally useful.
> 
> Okay, agreed, I'll rework the change to use palmetto-bmc for the
> machine name. Thanks for the feedback.

Yes. palmetto-bmc is good choice. Palmetto is a reference machine
for OpenPOWER. 

May be change also :

+    mc->desc = "OpenPOWER AST2400 BMC (ARM926EJ-S)";

to reflect that choice.

Thanks,

C.