From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: asm9260: remove incorrect __init/__exit annotations
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E92854.6060705@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316093008.GB20227@piout.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2552 bytes --]
Am 16.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/03/2016 at 22:44:31 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> The probe and remove callbacks of the platform driver are marked __init
>> and __exit, respectively. However, this is not a correct way to annotate
>> them, as it will result in those sections to be discarded at link time
>> or after boot, while we can actually call them again based on manual
>> unbinding, or deferred probing.
>>
>> Kbuild warns about the problem:
>>
>> WARNING: drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.o(.data+0x0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable asm9260_rtc_driver to the function .init.text:asm9260_rtc_probe()
>>
>
> I'm not sure why this was not caught before. I'm not building all the
> platform but that one should have been easy to find...
Sorry, i'm working on monolit kernel. Haven't seen this warning before :(
>> This removes the annotations, so we no longer branch into missing
>> code and avoid the warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Fixes: 125e550fd257 ("rtc: add Alphascale asm9260 driver")
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> index 14e08c4c1a01..355fdb97a006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops asm9260_rtc_ops = {
>> .alarm_irq_enable = asm9260_alarm_irq_enable,
>> };
>>
>> -static int __init asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ err_return:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __exit asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.0
>>
>
--
Regards,
Oleksij
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: asm9260: remove incorrect __init/__exit annotations
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E92854.6060705@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316093008.GB20227@piout.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2095 bytes --]
Am 16.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/03/2016 at 22:44:31 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> The probe and remove callbacks of the platform driver are marked __init
>> and __exit, respectively. However, this is not a correct way to annotate
>> them, as it will result in those sections to be discarded at link time
>> or after boot, while we can actually call them again based on manual
>> unbinding, or deferred probing.
>>
>> Kbuild warns about the problem:
>>
>> WARNING: drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.o(.data+0x0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable asm9260_rtc_driver to the function .init.text:asm9260_rtc_probe()
>>
>
> I'm not sure why this was not caught before. I'm not building all the
> platform but that one should have been easy to find...
Sorry, i'm working on monolit kernel. Haven't seen this warning before :(
>> This removes the annotations, so we no longer branch into missing
>> code and avoid the warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Fixes: 125e550fd257 ("rtc: add Alphascale asm9260 driver")
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> index 14e08c4c1a01..355fdb97a006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
>> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops asm9260_rtc_ops = {
>> .alarm_irq_enable = asm9260_alarm_irq_enable,
>> };
>>
>> -static int __init asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ err_return:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __exit asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int asm9260_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.0
>>
>
--
Regards,
Oleksij
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 21:44 [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: asm9260: remove incorrect __init/__exit annotations Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-15 21:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-16 9:30 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-16 9:30 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-16 9:33 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2016-03-16 9:33 ` Oleksij Rempel
2016-03-18 23:05 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E92854.6060705@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.