All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] vfio/pci: replace 1 with PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT to make code self-explain
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:52:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E94914.1040803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E9433C.1040503@msgid.tls.msk.ru>



On 16/03/2016 12:27, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> >      for (tmp = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST]; tmp;
>> > -         tmp = pdev->config[tmp + 1]) {
>> > +         tmp = pdev->config[tmp + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT]) {
>> > -    next = pdev->config[pos + 1];
>> > +    next = pdev->config[pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT];
> Hmm. I'm not sure the new version is better, to me "+1" reads
> easier than the new symbolic constant variant.
> 
> If it were something like pdev->config[PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT], that'd be
> nice, but not "pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT".
> 
> But again, I'm not pci config space expert and don't understand
> the basics :)

Each capability is a node of a linked list, and the position of the next
capability is at offset 1 inside the capability (here it is at offset 1
from the tmp or pos base).  I think the patch is an improvement.

Paolo


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vfio/pci: replace 1 with PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT to make code self-explain
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:52:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E94914.1040803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E9433C.1040503@msgid.tls.msk.ru>



On 16/03/2016 12:27, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> >      for (tmp = pdev->config[PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST]; tmp;
>> > -         tmp = pdev->config[tmp + 1]) {
>> > +         tmp = pdev->config[tmp + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT]) {
>> > -    next = pdev->config[pos + 1];
>> > +    next = pdev->config[pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT];
> Hmm. I'm not sure the new version is better, to me "+1" reads
> easier than the new symbolic constant variant.
> 
> If it were something like pdev->config[PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT], that'd be
> nice, but not "pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT".
> 
> But again, I'm not pci config space expert and don't understand
> the basics :)

Each capability is a node of a linked list, and the position of the next
capability is at offset 1 inside the capability (here it is at offset 1
from the tmp or pos base).  I think the patch is an improvement.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-11  0:54 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] vfio/pci: replace 1 with PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT to make code self-explain Wei Yang
2016-02-11  0:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Yang
2016-03-16 11:27 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
2016-03-16 11:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
2016-03-16 11:52   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-16 11:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-17 15:01     ` [Qemu-trivial] " Wei Yang
2016-03-17 15:01       ` [Qemu-devel] " Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E94914.1040803@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.