From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: build: Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized for ARC gcc 4.8
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:50:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EBD65B.10109@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23667289.mNa1Q2STbY@wuerfel>
On Friday 18 March 2016 03:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 14:16:23 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> index fed12f39d8ce..aeb101e8e674 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> @@ -48,9 +48,14 @@ endif
>> upto_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -le, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0408, y)
>> +is_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -eq, 0408, y)
>>
>> cflags-$(atleast_gcc44) += -fsection-anchors
>>
>> +# gcc 4.8 spits out false positives for default -O3
>> +# disable these for 4.8 and revisit when we upgrade to newer ver
>> +cflags-$(is_gcc48) += $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
>> +
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC) += -mlock
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_SWAPE) += -mswape
>
> Is this any better with gcc-4.9 or gcc-5?
I don't think there's a production ARC toolchain with gcc 4.9 which we can use yet
- Claudiu is still in the the middle of upstreaming the new ARC HS port bits so
things are still in flight there. These tools are off of github !
Maybe it's better to add the flag to
> the line that adds -O3 for consistency. We do the same thing for -Os in the
> global Makefile, as that triggers a similar load of warnings.
Sure, but I prefer this to be only for gcc 4.8 as this warning seems to be
healthy in small doses :-) At least it keeps the door open for future discussion
with gcc guys !
The following nested construct actually works - does that look OK to you ?
ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, $(call
cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
Thx,
-Vineet
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARC: build: Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized for ARC gcc 4.8
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:50:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EBD65B.10109@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23667289.mNa1Q2STbY@wuerfel>
On Friday 18 March 2016 03:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 14:16:23 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> index fed12f39d8ce..aeb101e8e674 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> @@ -48,9 +48,14 @@ endif
>> upto_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -le, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0408, y)
>> +is_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -eq, 0408, y)
>>
>> cflags-$(atleast_gcc44) += -fsection-anchors
>>
>> +# gcc 4.8 spits out false positives for default -O3
>> +# disable these for 4.8 and revisit when we upgrade to newer ver
>> +cflags-$(is_gcc48) += $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
>> +
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC) += -mlock
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_SWAPE) += -mswape
>
> Is this any better with gcc-4.9 or gcc-5?
I don't think there's a production ARC toolchain with gcc 4.9 which we can use yet
- Claudiu is still in the the middle of upstreaming the new ARC HS port bits so
things are still in flight there. These tools are off of github !
Maybe it's better to add the flag to
> the line that adds -O3 for consistency. We do the same thing for -Os in the
> global Makefile, as that triggers a similar load of warnings.
Sure, but I prefer this to be only for gcc 4.8 as this warning seems to be
healthy in small doses :-) At least it keeps the door open for future discussion
with gcc guys !
The following nested construct actually works - does that look OK to you ?
ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, $(call
cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
Thx,
-Vineet
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
<linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: build: Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized for ARC gcc 4.8
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:50:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EBD65B.10109@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23667289.mNa1Q2STbY@wuerfel>
On Friday 18 March 2016 03:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2016 14:16:23 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> index fed12f39d8ce..aeb101e8e674 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
>> @@ -48,9 +48,14 @@ endif
>> upto_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -le, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc44 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0404, y)
>> atleast_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -ge, 0408, y)
>> +is_gcc48 := $(call cc-ifversion, -eq, 0408, y)
>>
>> cflags-$(atleast_gcc44) += -fsection-anchors
>>
>> +# gcc 4.8 spits out false positives for default -O3
>> +# disable these for 4.8 and revisit when we upgrade to newer ver
>> +cflags-$(is_gcc48) += $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
>> +
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC) += -mlock
>> cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_SWAPE) += -mswape
>
> Is this any better with gcc-4.9 or gcc-5?
I don't think there's a production ARC toolchain with gcc 4.9 which we can use yet
- Claudiu is still in the the middle of upstreaming the new ARC HS port bits so
things are still in flight there. These tools are off of github !
Maybe it's better to add the flag to
> the line that adds -O3 for consistency. We do the same thing for -Os in the
> global Makefile, as that triggers a similar load of warnings.
Sure, but I prefer this to be only for gcc 4.8 as this warning seems to be
healthy in small doses :-) At least it keeps the door open for future discussion
with gcc guys !
The following nested construct actually works - does that look OK to you ?
ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, $(call
cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
Thx,
-Vineet
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 8:46 [PATCH] ARC: build: Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized for ARC gcc 4.8 Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 8:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 8:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 10:20 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2016-03-18 10:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 10:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 10:43 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 10:43 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 10:43 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 13:01 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 13:01 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 13:01 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-18 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EBD65B.10109@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.