All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cui Bixuan <cuibixuan@huawei.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] max_map_count fail in arm64 system which support lib32
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:00:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F25B1C.6070401@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160322142842.GE10905@rei.suse.cz>

On 2016/3/22 22:28, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I add a print:
>>
>> #elif defined(__arm__)
>> if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
>>         {
>>                 printf("%s\n", line);  // I add
>>                 return true;
>>         }
>>
>> and then run it(32bit SDK):
> 
> ...
> 
>> So I think:
>> * arm 64bit kernel doesn't have 'special vma VSYSCALL' so no need to skip(32bit binary skip so fail);
>> * arm 32bit kernel have 'special vma VSYSCALL';
> 
> That is what I think as well.
> 
> If you look at the code it does #if defined(__arm__) which is true if
> you compile for 32bit arm, on 64bit __aarch64__ is defined instead.
> 
> Which is why I said we should do runtime check using the machine from
> uname(2) on arm in order to skip the check in case that 32bit arm binary
> runs on 64bit kernel. It should contain something as armvX on 32bit arm
> and aarch64 on 64bit.
Hi,
    I send a patch which uses string check(strstr function) instead of '#if defined' check.
And it contains arm, x86 and ia64.

Thanks,
Cui Bixuan
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-07 11:08 [LTP] max_map_count fail in arm64 system which support lib32 Cui Bixuan
2016-03-22 10:29 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-22 13:49   ` Cui Bixuan
2016-03-22 14:28     ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-23  8:53       ` [LTP] [PATCH] max_map_count: fix error by using runtime check Cui Bixuan
2016-03-23 10:22         ` Jan Stancek
2016-03-23 11:59           ` Cui Bixuan
2016-03-31 12:07           ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-05 11:47             ` Cui Bixuan
2016-04-11 17:03               ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-12  7:15                 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Cui Bixuan
2016-04-12 13:07                   ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-23  9:00       ` Cui Bixuan [this message]
2016-12-16  8:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH] max_map_count: fix a mistake and support it for aarch64_be Cui Bixuan
2016-12-16 10:15   ` [LTP] we can ignore it and discuss the problem at 'Fix wrong checking of aarch64' from the_hoang0709@yahoo.com Cui Bixuan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F25B1C.6070401@huawei.com \
    --to=cuibixuan@huawei.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.