All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cui Bixuan <cuibixuan@gmail.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] max_map_count: fix error by using runtime check
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:59:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F2851F.8080103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242994016.13404335.1458728559657.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>



在 2016/3/23 18:22, Jan Stancek 写道:


>> -	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
>> -		return true;
>> -#elif defined(__ia64__)
>> -	/* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
>> -	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
>> -		return true;
>> -#elif defined(__arm__)
>> -	/* Older arm kernels didn't label their vdso maps */
>> -	if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
>> -		return true;
>> -#endif
>> +	if (strstr(un.machine, "x86") != NULL)
>
> What if uname contains i386?
Yes, you are right, I have a mistake.

>
> Can we relax the pass condition to allow map_count to be
> within some tolerance? Then we wouldn't have to worry so much about
> all arch specifics.
Does it influence the case if we relax the pass condition?  I think we 
shuold think about it.

Thanks
Cui Bixuan
>
>

>>   	return false;
>>   }
>> --
>> 1.8.3.4
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-07 11:08 [LTP] max_map_count fail in arm64 system which support lib32 Cui Bixuan
2016-03-22 10:29 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-22 13:49   ` Cui Bixuan
2016-03-22 14:28     ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-23  8:53       ` [LTP] [PATCH] max_map_count: fix error by using runtime check Cui Bixuan
2016-03-23 10:22         ` Jan Stancek
2016-03-23 11:59           ` Cui Bixuan [this message]
2016-03-31 12:07           ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-05 11:47             ` Cui Bixuan
2016-04-11 17:03               ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-12  7:15                 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Cui Bixuan
2016-04-12 13:07                   ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-03-23  9:00       ` [LTP] max_map_count fail in arm64 system which support lib32 Cui Bixuan
2016-12-16  8:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH] max_map_count: fix a mistake and support it for aarch64_be Cui Bixuan
2016-12-16 10:15   ` [LTP] we can ignore it and discuss the problem at 'Fix wrong checking of aarch64' from the_hoang0709@yahoo.com Cui Bixuan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F2851F.8080103@gmail.com \
    --to=cuibixuan@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.