From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:22:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net>
Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit :
> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
>> through a new device called chipid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> [nicolas.ferre at atmel.com: remove useless warnings]
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----
We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc
branches: what do you think Alexandre?
Anyway, I can do it myself: no need to re-send a version:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
We'll queue it in our upcoming at91-4.7-dt and at91-4.7-soc branches.
Bye,
>> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> index 7fd64ec..0b1fcbf 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ compatible: must be one of:
>> - "atmel,sama5d43"
>> - "atmel,sama5d44"
>>
>> +Chipid required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,sama5d2-chipid"
>> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
>> +
>> PIT Timer required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9260-pit"
>> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> index 54343ff..034d563 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> @@ -22,48 +22,93 @@
>> #include "soc.h"
>>
>> #define AT91_DBGU_CIDR 0x40
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>> #define AT91_DBGU_EXID 0x44
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_CIDR 0x00
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_EXID 0x04
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>>
>> -struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> {
>> - struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> - const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> - struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> struct device_node *np;
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> - u32 cidr, exid;
>>
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
>> if (!np)
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
>> "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - if (!np) {
>> - pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
>> - return NULL;
>> + regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> + if (!regs) {
>> + pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> +
>> + iounmap(regs);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-chipid");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> of_node_put(np);
>>
>> if (!regs) {
>> pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> - return NULL;
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> - cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> - exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_EXID);
>>
>> iounmap(regs);
>>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> + const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> + u32 cidr, exid;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * With SAMA5D2 and later SoCs, CIDR and EXID registers are no more
>> + * in the dbgu device but in the chipid device whose purpose is only
>> + * to expose these two registers.
>> + */
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret)
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> + pr_warn("Could not find identification node");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (soc = socs; soc->name; soc++) {
>> - if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> + if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> + if (!(cidr & AT91_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -79,7 +124,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> soc_dev_attr->family = soc->family;
>> soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->name;
>> soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>> kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
>> @@ -91,7 +136,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> if (soc->family)
>> pr_info("Detected SoC family: %s\n", soc->family);
>> pr_info("Detected SoC: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>>
>> return soc_dev;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:22:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net>
Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
>> through a new device called chipid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> [nicolas.ferre@atmel.com: remove useless warnings]
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----
We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc
branches: what do you think Alexandre?
Anyway, I can do it myself: no need to re-send a version:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
We'll queue it in our upcoming at91-4.7-dt and at91-4.7-soc branches.
Bye,
>> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> index 7fd64ec..0b1fcbf 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ compatible: must be one of:
>> - "atmel,sama5d43"
>> - "atmel,sama5d44"
>>
>> +Chipid required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,sama5d2-chipid"
>> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
>> +
>> PIT Timer required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9260-pit"
>> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> index 54343ff..034d563 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> @@ -22,48 +22,93 @@
>> #include "soc.h"
>>
>> #define AT91_DBGU_CIDR 0x40
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>> #define AT91_DBGU_EXID 0x44
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_CIDR 0x00
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_EXID 0x04
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>>
>> -struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> {
>> - struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> - const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> - struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> struct device_node *np;
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> - u32 cidr, exid;
>>
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
>> if (!np)
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
>> "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - if (!np) {
>> - pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
>> - return NULL;
>> + regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> + if (!regs) {
>> + pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> +
>> + iounmap(regs);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-chipid");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> of_node_put(np);
>>
>> if (!regs) {
>> pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> - return NULL;
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> - cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> - exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_EXID);
>>
>> iounmap(regs);
>>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> + const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> + u32 cidr, exid;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * With SAMA5D2 and later SoCs, CIDR and EXID registers are no more
>> + * in the dbgu device but in the chipid device whose purpose is only
>> + * to expose these two registers.
>> + */
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret)
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> + pr_warn("Could not find identification node");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (soc = socs; soc->name; soc++) {
>> - if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> + if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> + if (!(cidr & AT91_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -79,7 +124,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> soc_dev_attr->family = soc->family;
>> soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->name;
>> soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>> kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
>> @@ -91,7 +136,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> if (soc->family)
>> pr_info("Detected SoC family: %s\n", soc->family);
>> pr_info("Detected SoC: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>>
>> return soc_dev;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Cc: <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:22:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net>
Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
>> through a new device called chipid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> [nicolas.ferre@atmel.com: remove useless warnings]
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----
We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc
branches: what do you think Alexandre?
Anyway, I can do it myself: no need to re-send a version:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
We'll queue it in our upcoming at91-4.7-dt and at91-4.7-soc branches.
Bye,
>> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> index 7fd64ec..0b1fcbf 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ compatible: must be one of:
>> - "atmel,sama5d43"
>> - "atmel,sama5d44"
>>
>> +Chipid required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,sama5d2-chipid"
>> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
>> +
>> PIT Timer required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9260-pit"
>> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> index 54343ff..034d563 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> @@ -22,48 +22,93 @@
>> #include "soc.h"
>>
>> #define AT91_DBGU_CIDR 0x40
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>> #define AT91_DBGU_EXID 0x44
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_CIDR 0x00
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_EXID 0x04
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>>
>> -struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> {
>> - struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> - const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> - struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> struct device_node *np;
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> - u32 cidr, exid;
>>
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
>> if (!np)
>> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
>> "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - if (!np) {
>> - pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
>> - return NULL;
>> + regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> + if (!regs) {
>> + pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> +
>> + iounmap(regs);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-chipid");
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> of_node_put(np);
>>
>> if (!regs) {
>> pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> - return NULL;
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> }
>>
>> - cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> - exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_CIDR);
>> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_EXID);
>>
>> iounmap(regs);
>>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +{
>> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> + const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> + u32 cidr, exid;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * With SAMA5D2 and later SoCs, CIDR and EXID registers are no more
>> + * in the dbgu device but in the chipid device whose purpose is only
>> + * to expose these two registers.
>> + */
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret)
>> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(&cidr, &exid);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> + pr_warn("Could not find identification node");
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (soc = socs; soc->name; soc++) {
>> - if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> + if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> + if (!(cidr & AT91_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -79,7 +124,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> soc_dev_attr->family = soc->family;
>> soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->name;
>> soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>> kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
>> @@ -91,7 +136,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> if (soc->family)
>> pr_info("Detected SoC family: %s\n", soc->family);
>> pr_info("Detected SoC: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
>> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>>
>> return soc_dev;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 7:21 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91/soc: reference the whole sama5d2 family Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 7:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2: add chipid node Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 7:21 ` Ludovic Desroches
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-18 10:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-23 11:22 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2016-03-23 11:22 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-23 11:22 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-23 13:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-23 13:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-23 13:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-29 13:53 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 13:53 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 13:53 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-20 0:45 ` Rob Herring
2016-03-20 0:45 ` Rob Herring
2016-03-20 0:45 ` Rob Herring
2016-03-29 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 14:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 " Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-03-29 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-29 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.