From: oulijun <oulijun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
gongyangming-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
xiaokun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
tangchaofei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
haifeng.wei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
yisen.zhuang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
yankejian-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
lisheng011-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
charles.chenxin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:20:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160322185412.GA6262-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 +
>
> To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level
> of the directory hierarchy.
>
> Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though.
>
> .
>
Hi Christoph Hellwig,
surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon
level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which
will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the
level.
In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However,
It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes
of building and running nor huge.
thanks
Lijun Ou
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: <dledford@redhat.com>, <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
<hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>, <jiri@mellanox.com>,
<ogerlitz@mellanox.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<gongyangming@huawei.com>, <xiaokun@huawei.com>,
<tangchaofei@huawei.com>, <haifeng.wei@huawei.com>,
<yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>, <yankejian@huawei.com>,
<lisheng011@huawei.com>, <charles.chenxin@huawei.com>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:20:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160322185412.GA6262@infradead.org>
On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 +
>
> To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level
> of the directory hierarchy.
>
> Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though.
>
> .
>
Hi Christoph Hellwig,
surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon
level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which
will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the
level.
In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However,
It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes
of building and running nor huge.
thanks
Lijun Ou
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oulijun <oulijun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
<davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
<jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
<ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<gongyangming-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<xiaokun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<tangchaofei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<haifeng.wei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<yisen.zhuang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<yankejian-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<lisheng011-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<charles.chenxin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
<linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:20:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160322185412.GA6262-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 +
>
> To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level
> of the directory hierarchy.
>
> Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though.
>
> .
>
Hi Christoph Hellwig,
surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon
level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which
will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the
level.
In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However,
It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes
of building and running nor huge.
thanks
Lijun Ou
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 14:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:06 ` Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:06 ` Lijun Ou
[not found] ` <1458655621-3618-1-git-send-email-oulijun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-22 14:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] net: hns: Add reset function support for " Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:06 ` Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:06 ` Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:07 ` Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:07 ` Lijun Ou
[not found] ` <1458655621-3618-3-git-send-email-oulijun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-22 18:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 18:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20160322185412.GA6262-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-23 12:20 ` oulijun [this message]
2016-03-23 12:20 ` oulijun
2016-03-23 12:20 ` oulijun
2016-03-22 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] IB/hns: Add binding document for HiSilicon RoCE driver Lijun Ou
2016-03-22 14:07 ` Lijun Ou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com \
--to=oulijun-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=charles.chenxin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gongyangming-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=haifeng.wei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lisheng011-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tangchaofei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiaokun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yankejian-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yisen.zhuang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.