All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	abologna@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: qmp: add query-gic-capabilities interface
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:31:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F2A8B3.1000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpot47bo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]

On 03/23/2016 08:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>>> query-gic-capabilities looks like it fundamentally returns a list of
>>> capabilities.  Returning ['GICCapability'] is just fine then.
>>
>> I have posted v6 just as Eric has suggested. At least one advantage
>> is that it is easier to be extended (if needed) in the future, also
>> to follow the more-generic format to use dicts rather than
>> arrays. If you would not mind, I'll keep the dict interface there.
> 
> Returning such a list of a structured type is a well-established
> convention by now --- qmp-introspect.c shows 28 commands doing it, most
> of them named query-FOO.  I'd rather not start a different convention
> now, just because we got temporarily confused about our own rules.  So,
> unless there's something about query-gic-capabilities that makes it more
> likely to need extension outside its list element type, let's stick to
> returning the list.
> 
> Eric?

Makes sense to me, and perhaps my own fault for getting confused by not
even trying to delete just the whitelist line and seeing what would
happen.  Having a consistent style of query-* returning an array type is
reasonable to continue.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: wei@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	abologna@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: qmp: add query-gic-capabilities interface
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:31:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F2A8B3.1000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpot47bo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]

On 03/23/2016 08:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>>> query-gic-capabilities looks like it fundamentally returns a list of
>>> capabilities.  Returning ['GICCapability'] is just fine then.
>>
>> I have posted v6 just as Eric has suggested. At least one advantage
>> is that it is easier to be extended (if needed) in the future, also
>> to follow the more-generic format to use dicts rather than
>> arrays. If you would not mind, I'll keep the dict interface there.
> 
> Returning such a list of a structured type is a well-established
> convention by now --- qmp-introspect.c shows 28 commands doing it, most
> of them named query-FOO.  I'd rather not start a different convention
> now, just because we got temporarily confused about our own rules.  So,
> unless there's something about query-gic-capabilities that makes it more
> likely to need extension outside its list element type, let's stick to
> returning the list.
> 
> Eric?

Makes sense to me, and perhaps my own fault for getting confused by not
even trying to delete just the whitelist line and seeing what would
happen.  Having a consistent style of query-* returning an array type is
reasonable to continue.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-18  3:27 [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 1/5] arm: qmp: add GICCapability struct Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:29   ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 18:29     ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 18:41     ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 18:41       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  2:58       ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  2:58         ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:33         ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  9:33           ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 11:48           ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23 11:48             ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 12:21             ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 12:21               ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 14:25               ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23 14:25                 ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 15:17                 ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 15:17                   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-24  2:27                   ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-24  2:27                     ` Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:32   ` [Qemu-arm] " Eric Blake
2016-03-22 18:32     ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2016-03-23  3:09     ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  3:09       ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:44       ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  9:44         ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 11:56         ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23 11:56           ` Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: qmp: add query-gic-capabilities interface Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-22 18:28   ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 18:28     ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  4:14     ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  4:14       ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:52       ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  9:52         ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 12:04         ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23 12:04           ` Peter Xu
2016-03-23 14:06           ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 14:06             ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23 14:31             ` Eric Blake [this message]
2016-03-23 14:31               ` Eric Blake
2016-03-22 18:42   ` [Qemu-arm] " Eric Blake
2016-03-22 18:42     ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2016-03-22 19:09     ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 19:09       ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  4:07     ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  4:07       ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  9:54       ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  9:54         ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 3/5] arm: enhance kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 4/5] kvm: add kvm_support_device() helper function Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 5/5] arm: implement query-gic-capabilities Peter Xu
2016-03-18  3:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-21 15:56 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v5 0/5] ARM: add query-gic-capabilities SMP command Andrea Bolognani
2016-03-21 15:56   ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrea Bolognani
2016-03-22  2:23   ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-22  2:23     ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu
2016-03-22 14:20 ` [Qemu-arm] " Markus Armbruster
2016-03-22 14:20   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-23  5:19   ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  5:19     ` Peter Xu
2016-03-22 14:49 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-23  5:43   ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Xu
2016-03-23  5:43     ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F2A8B3.1000701@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.