Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] i2c-mux: add common core data for every mux instance

[Peter Rosin <peda-SamgB31n2u5IcsJQ0EH25Q@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Vladimir,

On 2016-03-24 15:24, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 24.03.2016 13:05, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2016-03-24 10:50, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> On 05.01.2016 17:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>> @@ -196,21 +195,21 @@ static int i2c_arbitrator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  		dev_err(dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
>>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>>  	}
>>>> -	arb->parent = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(parent_np);
>>>> +	muxc->parent = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(parent_np);
>>>
>>> why do you prefer here to use "unlocked" version of API?
>>>
>>> Foe example would it be safe/possible to unload an I2C bus device driver
>>> module or unbind I2C device itself in runtime?
>>
>> I think you ask why I change from of_get_i2c_... to of_find_i2c_..., and that
>> change was not intentional. It was the result of a bad merge during an early
>> rebase.
>>
>> Does that cover it?
>>
> 
> Yep, thank you for clarification, please account this in v3.

Oh , v3 is old news, v4 was sent out some weeks ago, and there is a v5
on a github branch. This bad rebase was fixed in v4.

> I'll try to find some time to review the whole changeset carefully,
> in fact I briefly reviewed it two months ago, but I didn't find
> anything obviously wrong that time.

Please put that on hold until I have rebased ontop of v4.6-rc1 and
changed a couple of other things. I'd hate for you to waste your
time on outdated patches.

Cheers,
Peter