From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
zhuhui@xiaomi.com, wangxq10@lzu.edu.cn,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix invalid node in alloc_migrate_target()
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:31:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F61EC8.7080508@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160325122237.4ca4e0dbca215ccbf4f49922@linux-foundation.org>
On 2016/3/26 3:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:56:04 +0800 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> It is incorrect to use next_node to find a target node, it will
>> return MAX_NUMNODES or invalid node. This will lead to crash in
>> buddy system allocation.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
>> @@ -289,11 +289,11 @@ struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
>> * now as a simple work-around, we use the next node for destination.
>> */
>> if (PageHuge(page)) {
>> - nodemask_t src = nodemask_of_node(page_to_nid(page));
>> - nodemask_t dst;
>> - nodes_complement(dst, src);
>> + int node = next_online_node(page_to_nid(page));
>> + if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
>> + node = first_online_node;
>> return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
>> - next_node(page_to_nid(page), dst));
>> + node);
>> }
>>
>> if (PageHighMem(page))
>
> Indeed. Can you tell us more about this circumstances under which the
> kernel will crash? I need to decide which kernel version(s) need the
> patch, but the changelog doesn't contain the info needed to make this
> decision (it should).
>
Hi Andrew,
I read the code v4.4, and find the following path maybe trigger the bug.
alloc_migrate_target()
alloc_huge_page_node() // the node may be offline or MAX_NUMNODES
__alloc_buddy_huge_page_no_mpol()
__alloc_buddy_huge_page()
__hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page()
alloc_pages_node()
__alloc_pages_node()
VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>, <zhuhui@xiaomi.com>,
<wangxq10@lzu.edu.cn>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix invalid node in alloc_migrate_target()
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:31:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F61EC8.7080508@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160325122237.4ca4e0dbca215ccbf4f49922@linux-foundation.org>
On 2016/3/26 3:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:56:04 +0800 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> It is incorrect to use next_node to find a target node, it will
>> return MAX_NUMNODES or invalid node. This will lead to crash in
>> buddy system allocation.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
>> @@ -289,11 +289,11 @@ struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
>> * now as a simple work-around, we use the next node for destination.
>> */
>> if (PageHuge(page)) {
>> - nodemask_t src = nodemask_of_node(page_to_nid(page));
>> - nodemask_t dst;
>> - nodes_complement(dst, src);
>> + int node = next_online_node(page_to_nid(page));
>> + if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
>> + node = first_online_node;
>> return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
>> - next_node(page_to_nid(page), dst));
>> + node);
>> }
>>
>> if (PageHighMem(page))
>
> Indeed. Can you tell us more about this circumstances under which the
> kernel will crash? I need to decide which kernel version(s) need the
> patch, but the changelog doesn't contain the info needed to make this
> decision (it should).
>
Hi Andrew,
I read the code v4.4, and find the following path maybe trigger the bug.
alloc_migrate_target()
alloc_huge_page_node() // the node may be offline or MAX_NUMNODES
__alloc_buddy_huge_page_no_mpol()
__alloc_buddy_huge_page()
__hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page()
alloc_pages_node()
__alloc_pages_node()
VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-26 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 6:56 [PATCH] mm: fix invalid node in alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu
2016-03-25 6:56 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-25 19:22 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-25 19:22 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-26 5:31 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2016-03-26 5:31 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-29 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 10:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 10:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 10:37 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-29 10:37 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-29 12:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 12:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 13:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 13:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-31 13:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-31 13:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-31 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-31 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01 8:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-01 8:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-29 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-29 12:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-29 12:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-30 1:13 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-03-30 1:13 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F61EC8.7080508@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangxq10@lzu.edu.cn \
--cc=zhuhui@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.