From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: Add BUG_ON if we over-write peer-map pointer.
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:04:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FE7FEA.5090708@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQkL5OM-QLVVe0RHEOoN-Vj4a0+U9EfaUf=2n+PO3mPDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/31/2016 11:09 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 31 March 2016 at 22:59, <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>
>> Not sure this can happen, but seems like a reasonable sanity
>> check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> index 94c27f6..172b1d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ void ath10k_peer_map_event(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
>> ath10k_warn(ar, /*ATH10K_DBG_HTT,*/ "htt peer map vdev %d peer %pM id %d\n",
>> ev->vdev_id, ev->addr, ev->peer_id);
>>
>> + BUG_ON(ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] && (ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] != peer));
>
> Does this really need to be a BUG_ON?
It means we have memory or logic corruption, or maybe we are out of sync with the
firmware, so I think it should be very visible, at least for a while. I haven't
hit it, so not sure it can happen anyway....
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: Add BUG_ON if we over-write peer-map pointer.
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:04:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FE7FEA.5090708@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQkL5OM-QLVVe0RHEOoN-Vj4a0+U9EfaUf=2n+PO3mPDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/31/2016 11:09 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 31 March 2016 at 22:59, <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>
>> Not sure this can happen, but seems like a reasonable sanity
>> check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> index 94c27f6..172b1d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
>> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ void ath10k_peer_map_event(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
>> ath10k_warn(ar, /*ATH10K_DBG_HTT,*/ "htt peer map vdev %d peer %pM id %d\n",
>> ev->vdev_id, ev->addr, ev->peer_id);
>>
>> + BUG_ON(ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] && (ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] != peer));
>
> Does this really need to be a BUG_ON?
It means we have memory or logic corruption, or maybe we are out of sync with the
firmware, so I think it should be very visible, at least for a while. I haven't
hit it, so not sure it can happen anyway....
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 20:59 [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure txrx-compl-task is stopped when cleaning htt-tx greearb
2016-03-31 20:59 ` greearb
2016-03-31 20:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath10k: Ensure peer_map references are cleaned up greearb
2016-03-31 20:59 ` greearb
2016-04-01 6:18 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-01 6:18 ` Michal Kazior
2016-03-31 20:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: Add BUG_ON if we over-write peer-map pointer greearb
2016-03-31 20:59 ` greearb
2016-04-01 6:09 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-01 6:09 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-01 14:04 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-04-01 14:04 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 6:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure txrx-compl-task is stopped when cleaning htt-tx Michal Kazior
2016-04-01 6:12 ` Michal Kazior
2016-04-01 20:36 ` Ben Greear
2016-04-01 20:36 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FE7FEA.5090708@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.