All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	open@codeaurora.org,
	"list@codeaurora.org:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@codeaurora.org:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@codeaurora.org:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER"
	<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:49:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5705846E.9050006@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0igB+iQSZO_GngNwRymVKTCKx2YK4BysO2KFXzpMqWwyw@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/06/2016 02:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>
>
> [cut]
>
>>>
>>> Well, nobody was using that event.
>>>
>>
>> True, but that's more of a bug in drivers/thermal/cpu-cooling.c and
>> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c. We should revert this patch and fix those
>> drivers. Does that seem acceptable to you?
>
> I'd rather see a patch series adding the event back along with some
> users.  One user at least.
>

Ok, I'll make those two drivers use them and send it out. It's very 
clearly a bug in those drivers.

-Saravana`

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	open@codeaurora.org,
	"list@codeaurora.org:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@codeaurora.org:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@codeaurora.org:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER"
	<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:49:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5705846E.9050006@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0igB+iQSZO_GngNwRymVKTCKx2YK4BysO2KFXzpMqWwyw@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/06/2016 02:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>
>
> [cut]
>
>>>
>>> Well, nobody was using that event.
>>>
>>
>> True, but that's more of a bug in drivers/thermal/cpu-cooling.c and
>> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c. We should revert this patch and fix those
>> drivers. Does that seem acceptable to you?
>
> I'd rather see a patch series adding the event back along with some
> users.  One user at least.
>

Ok, I'll make those two drivers use them and send it out. It's very 
clearly a bug in those drivers.

-Saravana`

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-06 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-03  3:06 [PATCH 0/7] CPUFreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:18   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-09 22:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-09 23:26     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10  0:39     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-10  0:51       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-10  0:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10  0:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]         ` <57057201.9030109@codeaurora.org>
2016-04-06 21:21           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-06 21:29             ` Saravana Kannan
2016-04-06 21:29               ` Saravana Kannan
2016-04-06 21:29               ` Saravana Kannan
2016-04-06 21:45               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-06 21:45                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-06 21:49                 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2016-04-06 21:49                   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: use memcpy() to copy policy Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: update user_policy.* on success Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: remove redundant 'governor' field from user_policy Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: remove redundant 'policy' " Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: rename cpufreq_real_policy as cpufreq_user_policy Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: drop !cpufreq_driver check from cpufreq_parse_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-08-03  3:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-28 15:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] CPUFreq: Minor cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5705846E.9050006@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=open@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.