From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Bart van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: fixup capacity calculation for 4k drives
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5709B41E.8010208@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459238815-15053-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
On 03/29/2016 01:06 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> in sd_read_capacity() the sdkp->capacity field changes its meaning:
> after the call to read_capacity_XX() it carries the _unscaled_ values,
> making the comparison between the original value and the new value
> always false for drives with a sector size != 512.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 5a5457a..0afe113 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static void read_capacity_error(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> #define READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET 10
>
> static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> - unsigned char *buffer)
> + unsigned char *buffer, u64 *capacity)
> {
> unsigned char cmd[16];
> struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> @@ -2054,8 +2054,8 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> int the_result;
> int retries = 3, reset_retries = READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET;
> unsigned int alignment;
> - unsigned long long lba;
> - unsigned sector_size;
> + u64 lba;
> + u32 sector_size;
>
> if (sdp->no_read_capacity_16)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp, "Too big for this kernel. Use a "
> "kernel compiled with support for large block "
> "devices.\n");
> - sdkp->capacity = 0;
> + *capacity = 0;
> return -EOVERFLOW;
> }
>
> @@ -2137,20 +2137,20 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> sd_config_discard(sdkp, SD_LBP_WS16);
> }
>
> - sdkp->capacity = lba + 1;
> + *capacity = lba + 1;
> return sector_size;
> }
>
> static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> - unsigned char *buffer)
> + unsigned char *buffer, u64 *capacity)
> {
> unsigned char cmd[16];
> struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> int sense_valid = 0;
> int the_result;
> int retries = 3, reset_retries = READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET;
> - sector_t lba;
> - unsigned sector_size;
> + u32 lba;
> + u32 sector_size;
>
> do {
> cmd[0] = READ_CAPACITY;
> @@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> /* Some buggy (usb cardreader) devices return an lba of
> 0xffffffff when the want to report a size of 0 (with
> which they really mean no media is present) */
> - sdkp->capacity = 0;
> + *capacity = 0;
> sdkp->physical_block_size = sector_size;
> return sector_size;
> }
> @@ -2200,11 +2200,11 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp, "Too big for this kernel. Use a "
> "kernel compiled with support for large block "
> "devices.\n");
> - sdkp->capacity = 0;
> + *capacity = 0;
> return -EOVERFLOW;
> }
>
> - sdkp->capacity = lba + 1;
> + *capacity = (u64)lba + 1;
> sdkp->physical_block_size = sector_size;
> return sector_size;
> }
> @@ -2230,34 +2230,38 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
> {
> int sector_size;
> struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> - sector_t old_capacity = sdkp->capacity;
> + u64 old_capacity = sdkp->capacity, new_capacity;
>
> if (sd_try_rc16_first(sdp)) {
> - sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer);
> + sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer,
> + &new_capacity);
> if (sector_size == -EOVERFLOW)
> goto got_data;
> if (sector_size == -ENODEV)
> return;
> if (sector_size < 0)
> - sector_size = read_capacity_10(sdkp, sdp, buffer);
> + sector_size = read_capacity_10(sdkp, sdp, buffer,
> + &new_capacity);
> if (sector_size < 0)
> return;
> } else {
> - sector_size = read_capacity_10(sdkp, sdp, buffer);
> + sector_size = read_capacity_10(sdkp, sdp, buffer,
> + &new_capacity);
> if (sector_size == -EOVERFLOW)
> goto got_data;
> if (sector_size < 0)
> return;
> if ((sizeof(sdkp->capacity) > 4) &&
> - (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffffULL)) {
> + (new_capacity > 0xffffffffULL)) {
> int old_sector_size = sector_size;
> sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Very big device. "
> "Trying to use READ CAPACITY(16).\n");
> - sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer);
> + sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, buffer,
> + &new_capacity);
> if (sector_size < 0) {
> sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
> "Using 0xffffffff as device size\n");
> - sdkp->capacity = 1 + (sector_t) 0xffffffff;
> + new_capacity = 1 + (u64) 0xffffffff;
> sector_size = old_sector_size;
> goto got_data;
> }
> @@ -2275,11 +2279,11 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
> * the capacity.
> */
> if (sdp->fix_capacity ||
> - (sdp->guess_capacity && (sdkp->capacity & 0x01))) {
> + (sdp->guess_capacity && (new_capacity & 0x01))) {
> sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp, "Adjusting the sector count "
> "from its reported value: %llu\n",
> - (unsigned long long) sdkp->capacity);
> - --sdkp->capacity;
> + (unsigned long long) new_capacity);
> + --new_capacity;
> }
>
> got_data:
> @@ -2301,7 +2305,7 @@ got_data:
> * would be relatively trivial to set the thing up.
> * For this reason, we leave the thing in the table.
> */
> - sdkp->capacity = 0;
> + new_capacity = 0;
> /*
> * set a bogus sector size so the normal read/write
> * logic in the block layer will eventually refuse any
> @@ -2312,6 +2316,19 @@ got_data:
> }
> blk_queue_logical_block_size(sdp->request_queue, sector_size);
>
> + /*
> + * Note: up to this point new_capacity carries the
> + * _unscaled_ capacity. So rescale capacity to 512-byte units.
> + */
> + if (sector_size == 4096)
> + sdkp->capacity = new_capacity << 3;
> + else if (sector_size == 2048)
> + sdkp->capacity = new_capacity << 2;
> + else if (sector_size == 1024)
> + sdkp->capacity = new_capacity << 1;
> + else
> + sdkp->capacity = new_capacity;
> +
> {
> char cap_str_2[10], cap_str_10[10];
>
> @@ -2337,14 +2354,6 @@ got_data:
> if (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffff)
> sdp->use_16_for_rw = 1;
>
> - /* Rescale capacity to 512-byte units */
> - if (sector_size == 4096)
> - sdkp->capacity <<= 3;
> - else if (sector_size == 2048)
> - sdkp->capacity <<= 2;
> - else if (sector_size == 1024)
> - sdkp->capacity <<= 1;
> -
> blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue,
> sdkp->physical_block_size);
> sdkp->device->sector_size = sector_size;
>
Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 8:06 [PATCH] sd: fixup capacity calculation for 4k drives Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-10 2:02 ` Lee Duncan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-21 12:27 Hannes Reinecke
2016-03-21 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 1:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-03-22 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 7:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-03-22 14:16 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-03-29 1:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5709B41E.8010208@suse.com \
--to=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.