CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.7

CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Greg,

The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most of the fs suite (http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/teuthology-2016-04-10_17:00:02-fs-hammer---basic-openstack/) failed 2 and has 5 dead. There are no matching tests in on the sepia lab.

Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Or should the above errors be investigated first ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Gregory Farnum]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most of the fs suite (http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/teuthology-2016-04-10_17:00:02-fs-hammer---basic-openstack/) failed 2 and has 5 dead. There are no matching tests in on the sepia lab.
>
> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Or should the above errors be investigated first ?

I'm sorry I lost track of this.

That test breakdown seems typical to me given the current state of our
suite on ovh. If one wanted to check carefully, verifying that all the
dead jobs have crashed OSDs (on ENOSPC or EIO) would verify that.

Otherwise, it's probably appropriate to start QE testing on the sepia lab.
-Greg