All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	paul.durrant@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, keir@xen.org
Subject: Re: [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:31:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570F3948.9070704@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570F3429.8070405@suse.com>

On 04/14/16 09:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 14/04/16 07:56, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> This indeed doesn't guard against LOCKed instructions being run in
>> parallel with and without emulation, however that is a case that should
>> almost never occur - at least not with introspection, where currently
>> all emulation happens as a result of EPT faults - so either all
>> instructions hitting a restricted page are emulated, or all ar run
>> directly. As long as all emulation can safely run in parallel and all
>> parallel non-emulation is also safe, it should be alright. But, yes,
>> this patch doesn't cover the case you're mentioning.
> 
> What about grant pages? There could be parallel accesses from different
> domains, one being introspected, the other not.

I'm not familiar with the code there, but the main issue is, I think,
LOCKed instructions that access (read / write) the same memory area - as
long as that doesn't happen, it should be fine, which may be the reason
why it hasn't caused problems so far.

While not perfect, I believe that the added safety is worth the small
performance impact for writes. I feel that going from unsafe parallel
emulation to safe parallel emulation is a good step to take, at least
until the problem can be fixed completely by more complex measures.


Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13 12:26 [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  4:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14  5:56   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  6:09     ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  6:31       ` Razvan Cojocaru [this message]
2016-04-14  7:46         ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  8:01           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14  8:18             ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  8:25               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  8:07     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14  8:09       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  9:08     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:33       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:44     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 16:00       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:11         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14  8:51   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:31     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:40       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 10:35 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-14 11:43   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:40     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 16:09         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:08         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-18 12:14           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-18 16:45             ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-19 11:01               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-19 16:35                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-26 16:03                   ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 17:23                     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-26 17:39                       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27  6:25                         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27  7:36                           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27  6:22                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27  7:14                         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:20                           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:30                             ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 14:41                               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 15:13                                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-04 11:32                                   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-04 13:42                                     ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-05  9:25                                       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-05 16:38                                         ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-13 15:27 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-13 15:51   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570F3948.9070704@bitdefender.com \
    --to=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.