From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:48:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5710AAE9.1020602@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570B8DEE.2020804@dachary.org>
Ping ?
On 11/04/2016 13:43, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-46).
>
> One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related to how ansible installs Amazon::S3
> The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/
>
> There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/?branch=hammer&suite=rgw as well but they are tainted by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/hammer backports.
>
> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-11 11:43 rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.7 Loic Dachary
2016-04-15 8:48 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2016-04-21 20:28 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5710AAE9.1020602@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncutler@suse.cz \
--cc=yehuda@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.