Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: Add bindings for phy-da8xx-usb

[David Lechner <david-nq/r/kbU++upp/zk7JDF2g@public.gmane.org>]

On 04/15/2016 05:48 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 4/14/2016 9:35 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>
>> Device tree binding for new phy-da8xx-usb driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david-nq/r/kbU++upp/zk7JDF2g@public.gmane.org>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>
>> v4 changes:
>>
>> * swapped order of usb20 and usb11 to be in logical order of reg address.
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt      | 40
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bead185
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-da8xx-usb.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> +TI DaVinci DA8xx USB PHY
>
>     DA8xx is not DaVinci, please omit this.

Just to be sure, you mean omit "DaVinci"?

>
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> + - compatible: must be "ti,da830-usbphy".
>> + - #phy-cells: must be 1.
>> +
>> +This device controls the PHY for both the USB 1.1 OHCI and USB 2.0 OTG
>> +controllers on DA8xx SoCs. Consumers of this device should use index
>> 0 for
>> +the USB 2.0 phy device and index 1 for the USB 1.1 phy device.
>
>     Not indices 2 and 1 already?

I changed this to reflect the TRM. USB0PHY = USB 2.0 and USB1PHY = USB 1.1

>
>> +    usbphy: usbphy {
>
>     Name it "usb-phy" please, consistent to what ePAPR has mandated for
> Ethernet PHYs.

Ack.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html