From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
tomoharu.fukawa.eb@renesas.com,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver documentation
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:00:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5713027.4ELTcTEoZh@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129193235.25423-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Hi Niklas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:32:34 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Documentation for Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver. The CSI-2 receivers
> are located between the video sources (CSI-2 transmitters) and the video
> grabbers (VIN) on Gen3 of Renesas R-Car SoC.
>
> Each CSI-2 device is connected to more then one VIN device which
s/then/than/
> simultaneously can receive video from the same CSI-2 device. Each VIN
> device can also be connected to more then one CSI-2 device. The routing
s/then/than/
> of which link are used are controlled by the VIN devices. There are only
s/link are/links are/ or s/link are/link is/
s/are controlled/is controlled/
> a few possible routes which are set by hardware limitations, which are
> different for each SoC in the Gen3 family.
>
> To work with the limitations of routing possibilities it is necessary
> for the DT bindings to describe which VIN device is connected to which
> CSI-2 device. This is why port 1 needs to to assign reg numbers for each
> VIN device that be connected to it. To setup and to know which links are
s/that be/that is/
> valid for each SoC is the responsibility of the VIN driver since the
> register to configure it belongs to the VIN hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt new file
> mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000..688afd83bf66f8cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2
> +------------------------
> +
> +The rcar-csi2 device provides MIPI CSI-2 capabilities for the Renesas R-Car
rcar-csi2 is the name of the driver, I would call it the "R-Car CSI-2 receiver
device" (or s/device/IP core/).
> +family of devices. It is to be used in conjunction with the R-Car VIN
> module,
The IP core itself doesn't have to be used with the VIN, but in R-Car SoCs it
is, so I would phrase it as "It is used ...".
> +which provides the video capture capabilities.
> +
> +Mandatory properties
> +--------------------
> + - compatible: Must be one or more of the following
> + - "renesas,r8a7795-csi2" for the R8A7795 device.
> + - "renesas,r8a7796-csi2" for the R8A7796 device.
> +
> + - reg: the register base and size for the device registers
> + - interrupts: the interrupt for the device
> + - clocks: Reference to the parent clock
Either capitalize the first word after the colon or don't, but please don't
mix them :-)
> +
> +The device node shall contain two 'port' child nodes according to the
> +bindings defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/
> +video-interfaces.txt. Port 0 shall connect the node that is the video
> +source for to the CSI-2.
Or simply "Port 0 shall connect to the CSI-2 source." ?
> Port 1 shall connect all the R-Car VIN
> +modules, which can make use of the CSI-2 module.
And to be a bit more explicit, how about "Port 1 shall connect to all the R-
Car VIN modules that have a hardware connection to the CSI-2 receiver." ?
> +
> +- Port 0 - Video source (Mandatory)
Nitpicking, I don't think you need to capitalize Mandatory.
> + - Endpoint 0 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is the video source
> +
> +- Port 1 - VIN instances (Mandatory for all VIN present in the SoC)
> + - Endpoint 0 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN0
> + - Endpoint 1 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN1
> + - Endpoint 2 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN2
> + - Endpoint 3 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN3
> + - Endpoint 4 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN4
> + - Endpoint 5 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN5
> + - Endpoint 6 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN6
> + - Endpoint 7 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN7
Should we clarify that only a subset of those endpoints shall be present when
the CSI-2 receiver isn't connected to all VIN instances ?
Furthermore, as explained in a comment I made when reviewing the VIN patch
series, I wonder whether we shouldn't identify the CSI-2 receiver instances by
ID the same way we do with the VIN instances (using the renesas,id property).
In that case I think the endpoint numbering won't matter.
> +Example:
> +
> + csi20: csi2@fea80000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r8a7796-csi2";
> + reg = <0 0xfea80000 0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <0 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 714>;
> + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7796_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> + resets = <&cpg 714>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + csi20_in: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + clock-lanes = <0>;
> + data-lanes = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&adv7482_txb>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + port@1 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + csi20vin0: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin0csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin1: endpoint@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin1csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin2: endpoint@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin2csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin3: endpoint@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin3csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin4: endpoint@4 {
> + reg = <4>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin4csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin5: endpoint@5 {
> + reg = <5>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin5csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin6: endpoint@6 {
> + reg = <6>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin6csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin7: endpoint@7 {
> + reg = <7>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin7csi20>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index aa71ab52fd76d160..4737de9f41bff570 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8652,6 +8652,7 @@ L: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> L: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git
> S: Supported
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt
> F: drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Niklas Söderlund"
<niklas.soderlund+renesas-1zkq55x86MTxsAP9Fp7wbw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
tomoharu.fukawa.eb-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver documentation
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:00:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5713027.4ELTcTEoZh@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129193235.25423-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas-1zkq55x86MTxsAP9Fp7wbw@public.gmane.org>
Hi Niklas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:32:34 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Documentation for Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver. The CSI-2 receivers
> are located between the video sources (CSI-2 transmitters) and the video
> grabbers (VIN) on Gen3 of Renesas R-Car SoC.
>
> Each CSI-2 device is connected to more then one VIN device which
s/then/than/
> simultaneously can receive video from the same CSI-2 device. Each VIN
> device can also be connected to more then one CSI-2 device. The routing
s/then/than/
> of which link are used are controlled by the VIN devices. There are only
s/link are/links are/ or s/link are/link is/
s/are controlled/is controlled/
> a few possible routes which are set by hardware limitations, which are
> different for each SoC in the Gen3 family.
>
> To work with the limitations of routing possibilities it is necessary
> for the DT bindings to describe which VIN device is connected to which
> CSI-2 device. This is why port 1 needs to to assign reg numbers for each
> VIN device that be connected to it. To setup and to know which links are
s/that be/that is/
> valid for each SoC is the responsibility of the VIN driver since the
> register to configure it belongs to the VIN hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas-1zkq55x86MTxsAP9Fp7wbw@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt new file
> mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000..688afd83bf66f8cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2
> +------------------------
> +
> +The rcar-csi2 device provides MIPI CSI-2 capabilities for the Renesas R-Car
rcar-csi2 is the name of the driver, I would call it the "R-Car CSI-2 receiver
device" (or s/device/IP core/).
> +family of devices. It is to be used in conjunction with the R-Car VIN
> module,
The IP core itself doesn't have to be used with the VIN, but in R-Car SoCs it
is, so I would phrase it as "It is used ...".
> +which provides the video capture capabilities.
> +
> +Mandatory properties
> +--------------------
> + - compatible: Must be one or more of the following
> + - "renesas,r8a7795-csi2" for the R8A7795 device.
> + - "renesas,r8a7796-csi2" for the R8A7796 device.
> +
> + - reg: the register base and size for the device registers
> + - interrupts: the interrupt for the device
> + - clocks: Reference to the parent clock
Either capitalize the first word after the colon or don't, but please don't
mix them :-)
> +
> +The device node shall contain two 'port' child nodes according to the
> +bindings defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/
> +video-interfaces.txt. Port 0 shall connect the node that is the video
> +source for to the CSI-2.
Or simply "Port 0 shall connect to the CSI-2 source." ?
> Port 1 shall connect all the R-Car VIN
> +modules, which can make use of the CSI-2 module.
And to be a bit more explicit, how about "Port 1 shall connect to all the R-
Car VIN modules that have a hardware connection to the CSI-2 receiver." ?
> +
> +- Port 0 - Video source (Mandatory)
Nitpicking, I don't think you need to capitalize Mandatory.
> + - Endpoint 0 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is the video source
> +
> +- Port 1 - VIN instances (Mandatory for all VIN present in the SoC)
> + - Endpoint 0 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN0
> + - Endpoint 1 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN1
> + - Endpoint 2 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN2
> + - Endpoint 3 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN3
> + - Endpoint 4 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN4
> + - Endpoint 5 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN5
> + - Endpoint 6 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN6
> + - Endpoint 7 - sub-node describing the endpoint that is VIN7
Should we clarify that only a subset of those endpoints shall be present when
the CSI-2 receiver isn't connected to all VIN instances ?
Furthermore, as explained in a comment I made when reviewing the VIN patch
series, I wonder whether we shouldn't identify the CSI-2 receiver instances by
ID the same way we do with the VIN instances (using the renesas,id property).
In that case I think the endpoint numbering won't matter.
> +Example:
> +
> + csi20: csi2@fea80000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r8a7796-csi2";
> + reg = <0 0xfea80000 0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <0 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 714>;
> + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7796_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> + resets = <&cpg 714>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + csi20_in: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + clock-lanes = <0>;
> + data-lanes = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&adv7482_txb>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + port@1 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + csi20vin0: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin0csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin1: endpoint@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin1csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin2: endpoint@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin2csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin3: endpoint@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin3csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin4: endpoint@4 {
> + reg = <4>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin4csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin5: endpoint@5 {
> + reg = <5>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin5csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin6: endpoint@6 {
> + reg = <6>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin6csi20>;
> + };
> + csi20vin7: endpoint@7 {
> + reg = <7>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin7csi20>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index aa71ab52fd76d160..4737de9f41bff570 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8652,6 +8652,7 @@ L: linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> L: linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git
> S: Supported
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,rcar-csi2.txt
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt
> F: drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 19:32 [PATCH v12 0/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-29 19:32 ` [PATCH v12 1/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver documentation Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-05 13:39 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-05 13:39 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-11 18:00 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-12-11 18:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-26 0:23 ` Niklas Söderlund
2018-01-26 0:23 ` Niklas Söderlund
2018-01-26 0:23 ` Niklas Söderlund
2018-01-26 0:32 ` Niklas Söderlund
2018-01-26 0:32 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-11-29 19:32 ` [PATCH v12 2/2] rcar-csi2: add Renesas R-Car MIPI CSI-2 receiver driver Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-01 13:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-01 13:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-02 11:08 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-02 11:08 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-02 14:05 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-02 14:05 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-02 14:50 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-02 14:50 ` Niklas Söderlund
2017-12-04 21:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-04 21:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-11 19:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5713027.4ELTcTEoZh@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomoharu.fukawa.eb@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.