From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@intel.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:49:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5715FF1B.80402@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5715FD6B.5000809@schinagl.nl>
Hi
On 04/19/2016 06:42 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 19-04-16 11:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 19 April 2016 at 09:12, Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> wrote:
>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>> I don't want us to invent a DT binding for something you *think* is a
>> HW controller issue.
>>
>> Have you really excluded that this isn't a software issue? Me
>> personally haven't been using HPI that much so I can't really tell
>> about the code robustness from the mmc core (mmc protocol point of
>> view).
> Well this patch goes hand in hand so to speak with the broken-hpi patch introduced by him, he did most of the investigation. We just discussed how to handle it and asked me to cook up the patch.
I didn't understand why add this property. Is this same patch?
commit 81f8a7be6642b4c26ab681b2e0f4c4120a6de1b0
Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 1 17:26:23 2015 +0200
mmc: Add support for marking hpi as broken through devicetree
The eMMC on a tablet I've will stop working / communicating as soon as
the kernel executes:
mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
There seems to be no way to reliable identify eMMC-s which have a broken
hpi implementation, but at least for eMMC's which are soldered onto a board
we can work around this by specifying that hpi is broken in devicetree.
>
> @hans, what do you think?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>>
>>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
>>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> index 6e4c55a..9b63b36 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> @@ -270,6 +270,8 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_HW_RESET;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sdio-irq"))
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>>> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-broken-hpi"))
>>> + host->caps |= MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "full-pwr-cycle"))
>>> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "keep-power-in-suspend"))
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> index 4dbe3df..9a19562 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>>> /*
>>> * Enable HPI feature (if supported)
>>> */
>>> - if (card->ext_csd.hpi) {
>>> + if (card->ext_csd.hpi && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI)) {
>>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>> EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> index 8dd4d29..20f758e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A (1 << 23) /* Host supports Driver Type A */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C (1 << 24) /* Host supports Driver Type C */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D (1 << 25) /* Host supports Driver Type D */
>>> +#define MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI (1 << 29) /* Host support for HPI is broken */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_CMD23 (1 << 30) /* CMD23 supported. */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_HW_RESET (1 << 31) /* Hardware reset */
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.8.0.rc3
>>>
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jh80.chung@samsung.com (Jaehoon Chung)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:49:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5715FF1B.80402@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5715FD6B.5000809@schinagl.nl>
Hi
On 04/19/2016 06:42 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 19-04-16 11:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 19 April 2016 at 09:12, Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> wrote:
>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>> I don't want us to invent a DT binding for something you *think* is a
>> HW controller issue.
>>
>> Have you really excluded that this isn't a software issue? Me
>> personally haven't been using HPI that much so I can't really tell
>> about the code robustness from the mmc core (mmc protocol point of
>> view).
> Well this patch goes hand in hand so to speak with the broken-hpi patch introduced by him, he did most of the investigation. We just discussed how to handle it and asked me to cook up the patch.
I didn't understand why add this property. Is this same patch?
commit 81f8a7be6642b4c26ab681b2e0f4c4120a6de1b0
Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 1 17:26:23 2015 +0200
mmc: Add support for marking hpi as broken through devicetree
The eMMC on a tablet I've will stop working / communicating as soon as
the kernel executes:
mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
There seems to be no way to reliable identify eMMC-s which have a broken
hpi implementation, but at least for eMMC's which are soldered onto a board
we can work around this by specifying that hpi is broken in devicetree.
>
> @hans, what do you think?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>>
>>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
>>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> index 6e4c55a..9b63b36 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> @@ -270,6 +270,8 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_HW_RESET;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sdio-irq"))
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>>> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-broken-hpi"))
>>> + host->caps |= MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "full-pwr-cycle"))
>>> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "keep-power-in-suspend"))
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> index 4dbe3df..9a19562 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>>> /*
>>> * Enable HPI feature (if supported)
>>> */
>>> - if (card->ext_csd.hpi) {
>>> + if (card->ext_csd.hpi && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI)) {
>>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>> EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> index 8dd4d29..20f758e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A (1 << 23) /* Host supports Driver Type A */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C (1 << 24) /* Host supports Driver Type C */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D (1 << 25) /* Host supports Driver Type D */
>>> +#define MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI (1 << 29) /* Host support for HPI is broken */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_CMD23 (1 << 30) /* CMD23 supported. */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_HW_RESET (1 << 31) /* Hardware reset */
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.8.0.rc3
>>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 7:12 [PATCHv1 0/2] mmc: Move broken-hpi also to the chipset level Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 9:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 9:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 9:42 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 9:42 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 9:49 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2016-04-19 9:49 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-04-19 12:20 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 12:20 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 12:44 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-04-19 12:44 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-04-19 9:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 9:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 11:22 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-19 11:22 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-19 12:45 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 12:45 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 19:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 19:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 10:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 10:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 12:21 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 12:21 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 13:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 13:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 7:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Mark the HPI of the mmc controller broken by default Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` Olliver Schinagl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5715FF1B.80402@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vbyravarasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenkai.du@intel.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.