From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:55:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57178A66.6090400@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461070748-767-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 19/04/16 13:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we move the release of the GEM request (i.e. decoupling it from the
> various lists used for client and context tracking) after it is complete
> (either by the GPU retiring the request, or by the caller cancelling the
> request), we can remove the requirement that the final unreference of
> the GEM request need to be under the struct_mutex.
>
> v2,v3: Rebalance execlists by moving the context unpinning.
> v4: Rebase onto -nightly
> v5: Avoid trying to rebalance execlist/GuC context pinning, leave that
> to the next step
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 14 --------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index c0a6fbff4678..c59b2670cc36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2370,23 +2370,9 @@ i915_gem_request_reference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> static inline void
> i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> {
> - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&req->engine->dev->struct_mutex));
> kref_put(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free);
> }
>
> -static inline void
> -i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> -{
> - struct drm_device *dev;
> -
> - if (!req)
> - return;
> -
> - dev = req->engine->dev;
> - if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -}
> -
> static inline void i915_gem_request_assign(struct drm_i915_gem_request **pdst,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *src)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 261185281e78..9b4854a17264 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1413,6 +1413,13 @@ static void i915_gem_request_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> list_del_init(&request->list);
> i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(request);
>
> + if (request->ctx) {
> + if (i915.enable_execlists)
> + intel_lr_context_unpin(request->ctx, request->engine);
> +
> + i915_gem_context_unreference(request->ctx);
> + }
> +
> i915_gem_request_unreference(request);
> }
>
> @@ -2713,18 +2720,6 @@ void i915_gem_request_free(struct kref *req_ref)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req = container_of(req_ref,
> typeof(*req), ref);
> - struct intel_context *ctx = req->ctx;
> -
> - if (req->file_priv)
> - i915_gem_request_remove_from_client(req);
> -
> - if (ctx) {
> - if (i915.enable_execlists)
> - intel_lr_context_unpin(ctx, req->engine);
> -
> - i915_gem_context_unreference(ctx);
> - }
> -
> kmem_cache_free(req->i915->requests, req);
> }
>
> @@ -3186,7 +3181,7 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> ret = __i915_wait_request(req[i], true,
> args->timeout_ns > 0 ? &args->timeout_ns : NULL,
> to_rps_client(file));
> - i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(req[i]);
> + i915_gem_request_unreference(req[i]);
> }
> return ret;
>
> @@ -4199,7 +4194,7 @@ i915_gem_ring_throttle(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> if (ret == 0)
> queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->mm.retire_work, 0);
>
> - i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(target);
> + i915_gem_request_unreference(target);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index ff60241b1f76..f5bf46f99cc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11399,7 +11399,7 @@ static void intel_mmio_flip_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> WARN_ON(__i915_wait_request(mmio_flip->req,
> false, NULL,
> &mmio_flip->i915->rps.mmioflips));
> - i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(mmio_flip->req);
> + i915_gem_request_unreference(mmio_flip->req);
> }
>
> /* For framebuffer backed by dmabuf, wait for fence */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index b7c218602c6e..ed3797bf41aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -7366,7 +7366,7 @@ static void __intel_rps_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
> gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(req->engine->dev), NULL,
> req->emitted_jiffies);
>
> - i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(req);
> + i915_gem_request_unreference(req);
> kfree(boost);
> }
>
>
If I am not too close to this:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 11:40 Premature unpinning Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915: Mark the current context as lost on suspend Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 14:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 14:20 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: L3 cache remapping is part of context switching Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Consolidate L3 remapping LRI Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915: Remove early l3-remap Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915: Rearrange switch_context to load the aliasing ppgtt on first use Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915: Assign every HW context a unique ID Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915: Replace the pinned context address with its " Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915: Refactor execlists default context pinning Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 12:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-20 14:07 ` Mika Kuoppala
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915: Move context initialisation to first-use Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915: Move the magical deferred context allocation into the request Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 12:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915: Track the previous pinned context inside " Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 12:59 ` Update to patches 11 and 12 Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 12:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 13:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-04-19 12:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Track the previous pinned context inside the request Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 14:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-20 14:18 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 14:22 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-20 16:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-20 14:24 ` [RFC 1/2] drm/i915: Store LRC hardware id in " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-20 14:24 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/i915: Stop tracking execlists retired requests Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-20 18:15 ` [RFC 1/2] drm/i915: Store LRC hardware id in the request Chris Wilson
2016-04-19 13:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,01/12] drm/i915: Mark the current context as lost on suspend Patchwork
2016-04-19 14:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2] drm/i915: Mark the current context as lost on suspend (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57178A66.6090400@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.