From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: arm/arm64: remove irq_phys_map from the arch timer
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57191433.40508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460729047-6346-7-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
On 04/15/2016 04:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Now that the interface between the arch timer and the VGIC does not
> require passing the irq_phys_map entry pointer anymore, let's remove
> it from the virtual arch timer and use the virtual IRQ number instead
> directly.
> The remaining pointer returned by kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq() will be
> removed in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> index b651aed..1ed70f6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu {
> /* Timer IRQ */
> struct kvm_irq_level irq;
>
> - /* VGIC mapping */
> - struct irq_phys_map *map;
> + /* The virtual IRQ number */
> + unsigned int virt_irq;
what's the difference between irq.irq and virt_irq? aren't they duplicates?
>
> /* Active IRQ state caching */
> bool active_cleared_last;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index cfdf88f..1598e23 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level)
>
> timer->active_cleared_last = false;
> timer->irq.level = new_level;
> - trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->map->virt_irq,
> + trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->virt_irq,
> timer->irq.level);
> ret = kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
> - timer->map->virt_irq,
> + timer->virt_irq,
> timer->irq.level);
> WARN_ON(ret);
> }
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * to ensure that hardware interrupts from the timer triggers a guest
> * exit.
> */
> - if (timer->irq.level || kvm_vgic_map_is_active(vcpu, timer->map->virt_irq))
> + if (timer->irq.level || kvm_vgic_map_is_active(vcpu, timer->virt_irq))
> phys_active = true;
> else
> phys_active = false;
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(map)))
> return PTR_ERR(map);
>
> - timer->map = map;
> + timer->virt_irq = irq->irq;
you also have a duplicate above:
timer->irq.irq = irq->irq;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -494,8 +494,8 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
>
> timer_disarm(timer);
> - if (timer->map)
> - kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(vcpu, timer->map->virt_irq);
> + if (timer->virt_irq)
> + kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(vcpu, timer->virt_irq);
always unmap?
Cheers
Eric
> }
>
> void kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm *kvm)
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: arm/arm64: remove irq_phys_map from the arch timer
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57191433.40508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460729047-6346-7-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
On 04/15/2016 04:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Now that the interface between the arch timer and the VGIC does not
> require passing the irq_phys_map entry pointer anymore, let's remove
> it from the virtual arch timer and use the virtual IRQ number instead
> directly.
> The remaining pointer returned by kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq() will be
> removed in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
> virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> index b651aed..1ed70f6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu {
> /* Timer IRQ */
> struct kvm_irq_level irq;
>
> - /* VGIC mapping */
> - struct irq_phys_map *map;
> + /* The virtual IRQ number */
> + unsigned int virt_irq;
what's the difference between irq.irq and virt_irq? aren't they duplicates?
>
> /* Active IRQ state caching */
> bool active_cleared_last;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index cfdf88f..1598e23 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level)
>
> timer->active_cleared_last = false;
> timer->irq.level = new_level;
> - trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->map->virt_irq,
> + trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->virt_irq,
> timer->irq.level);
> ret = kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
> - timer->map->virt_irq,
> + timer->virt_irq,
> timer->irq.level);
> WARN_ON(ret);
> }
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * to ensure that hardware interrupts from the timer triggers a guest
> * exit.
> */
> - if (timer->irq.level || kvm_vgic_map_is_active(vcpu, timer->map->virt_irq))
> + if (timer->irq.level || kvm_vgic_map_is_active(vcpu, timer->virt_irq))
> phys_active = true;
> else
> phys_active = false;
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(map)))
> return PTR_ERR(map);
>
> - timer->map = map;
> + timer->virt_irq = irq->irq;
you also have a duplicate above:
timer->irq.irq = irq->irq;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -494,8 +494,8 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
>
> timer_disarm(timer);
> - if (timer->map)
> - kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(vcpu, timer->map->virt_irq);
> + if (timer->virt_irq)
> + kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(vcpu, timer->virt_irq);
always unmap?
Cheers
Eric
> }
>
> void kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm *kvm)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 14:04 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: Rework arch timer IRQ interface Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: arm/arm64: remove unneeded map parameter for vgic_update_irq_pending() Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:08 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 17:08 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: arm/arm64: directly pass virtual IRQ number on injecting mapped IRQ Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 17:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-25 10:13 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-25 10:13 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: arm/arm64: directly pass virtual IRQ number on kvm_vgic_map_is_active() Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 17:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: directly pass virtual IRQ number on kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq() Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 17:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: arm/arm64: Remove the IRQ field from struct irq_phys_map Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 17:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 18:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 18:32 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-25 10:49 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-25 10:49 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-25 10:25 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-25 10:25 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: arm/arm64: remove irq_phys_map from the arch timer Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 17:56 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2016-04-21 17:56 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-25 10:29 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-25 10:29 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm/arm64: remove irq_phys_map pointer from kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq() Andre Przywara
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-21 18:04 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-21 18:04 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57191433.40508@linaro.org \
--to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.