From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:05:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571A058C.9000507@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461250597-16712-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 21/04/16 15:56, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Add scope parameter to the arm64_cpu_capabilities::matches(), so that
> this can be reused for checking the capability on a given CPU vs the
> system wide. The system uses the default scope associated with the
> capability for initialising the CPU_HWCAPs and ELF_HWCAPs.
>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
-71,7 +71,9 @@ DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>
> /* meta feature for alternatives */
> static bool __maybe_unused
> -cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry);
> +cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused);
> +
> +static u64 __raw_read_system_reg(u32 sys_id);
I missed getting rid of the above forward declaration, will respin the series.
Thanks
Suzuki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:05:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571A058C.9000507@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461250597-16712-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 21/04/16 15:56, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Add scope parameter to the arm64_cpu_capabilities::matches(), so that
> this can be reused for checking the capability on a given CPU vs the
> system wide. The system uses the default scope associated with the
> capability for initialising the CPU_HWCAPs and ELF_HWCAPs.
>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
-71,7 +71,9 @@ DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>
> /* meta feature for alternatives */
> static bool __maybe_unused
> -cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry);
> +cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused);
> +
> +static u64 __raw_read_system_reg(u32 sys_id);
I missed getting rid of the above forward declaration, will respin the series.
Thanks
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-22 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 14:56 [PATCH v3 0/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=n Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-04-22 11:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on a single CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] irqchip/gic: Restore CPU interface checking Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=N Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-21 14:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571A058C.9000507@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.