All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:43:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571A2A9D.7070702@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160422134053.GL2998@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 22/04/16 14:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> CPU Errata work arounds are detected and applied to the
>> kernel code at boot time and the data is then freed up.
>> If a new hotplugged CPU requires a work around which
>> was not applied at boot time, there is nothing we can
>> do but simply fail the booting.
>>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> I think Will commented on this previously. Was a decision made to leave
> this patch as it is and subsequently add support for enabling local
> workarounds for hot-plugged CPUs? I'm fine with this given that most

Yes. Applying work arounds for a hot-plugged CPU will be addressed in a
new series. I updated the cover letter, but missed to update the same here.

>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks
Suzuki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:43:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571A2A9D.7070702@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160422134053.GL2998@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 22/04/16 14:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> CPU Errata work arounds are detected and applied to the
>> kernel code at boot time and the data is then freed up.
>> If a new hotplugged CPU requires a work around which
>> was not applied at boot time, there is nothing we can
>> do but simply fail the booting.
>>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> I think Will commented on this previously. Was a decision made to leave
> this patch as it is and subsequently add support for enabling local
> workarounds for hot-plugged CPUs? I'm fine with this given that most

Yes. Applying work arounds for a hot-plugged CPU will be addressed in a
new series. I updated the cover letter, but missed to update the same here.

>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks
Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 11:25 [PATCH v4 0/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=n Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add scope for capability check Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 13:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on a single CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 13:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] irqchip/gic: Restore CPU interface checking Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 13:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:33     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: Verify CPU errata work arounds on hotplugged CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 13:40   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:40     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:43     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-04-22 13:43       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: Fix behavior of maxcpus=N Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 11:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-04-22 13:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-04-22 13:50     ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571A2A9D.7070702@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.