* memcpy() avoidance using decode(bufferlist)
@ 2016-04-22 13:53 David Disseldorp
2016-04-22 18:05 ` Casey Bodley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Disseldorp @ 2016-04-22 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
Hi,
A question regarding bufferlist usage:
I'm working on the cmpext librados C API, and want to decode the OSD
response directly into a (char *buf/size_t len) buffer provided by the
caller.
I figured this would be straightforward via:
bl.push_back(buffer::create_static(buf, len));
...
::decode_nohead(iter.get_remaining(), bl, iter);
However, the decoded data doesn't make it into buf, unless an extra copy
occurs via:
bl.copy(0, bl.length(), buf);
Any suggestions on a clean way to avoid the extra copy here?
Cheers, David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: memcpy() avoidance using decode(bufferlist)
2016-04-22 13:53 memcpy() avoidance using decode(bufferlist) David Disseldorp
@ 2016-04-22 18:05 ` Casey Bodley
2016-04-24 22:56 ` David Disseldorp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Casey Bodley @ 2016-04-22 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Disseldorp, ceph-devel
On 04/22/2016 09:53 AM, David Disseldorp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question regarding bufferlist usage:
>
> I'm working on the cmpext librados C API, and want to decode the OSD
> response directly into a (char *buf/size_t len) buffer provided by the
> caller.
>
> I figured this would be straightforward via:
> bl.push_back(buffer::create_static(buf, len));
> ...
> ::decode_nohead(iter.get_remaining(), bl, iter);
>
> However, the decoded data doesn't make it into buf, unless an extra copy
> occurs via:
> bl.copy(0, bl.length(), buf);
>
> Any suggestions on a clean way to avoid the extra copy here?
>
> Cheers, David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi David,
The decode logic is appending data to the end of the given bufferlist,
which is why it's skipping over the buffer pointer that you provide.
Internally, buffer::list is allocating its own 'buffer::ptr
append_buffer' to batch these appends. This append_buffer is not
currently exposed by the interface, but if there was a way to provide
your own buffer::ptr from buffer::create_static(), you could
hypothetically use that to avoid the copy.
Casey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: memcpy() avoidance using decode(bufferlist)
2016-04-22 18:05 ` Casey Bodley
@ 2016-04-24 22:56 ` David Disseldorp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Disseldorp @ 2016-04-24 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Bodley; +Cc: ceph-devel
Thanks for the tips Casey!
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:05:15 -0400, Casey Bodley wrote:
> This append_buffer is not
> currently exposed by the interface, but if there was a way to provide
> your own buffer::ptr from buffer::create_static(), you could
> hypothetically use that to avoid the copy.
That's a pity. In that case, I guess I'll keep the extra memcpy until
there's an API to directly provide the bufferlist destination buffer
here.
Cheers, David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-24 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-22 13:53 memcpy() avoidance using decode(bufferlist) David Disseldorp
2016-04-22 18:05 ` Casey Bodley
2016-04-24 22:56 ` David Disseldorp
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.