From: Carlos Rafael Giani <dv@pseudoterminal.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: base_ , oe.utils , bb.utils confusion
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:14:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571DFC30.10003@pseudoterminal.org> (raw)
Hello,
I've noticed that the base_* functions have been compatibility wrappers
for a while now.
What is confusing though is that some of the replacements are in
bb.utils , others in oe.utils. For example, base_contains becomes
bb.utils.contains, while base_conditional becomes oe.utils.conditional.
Is there any reason for this difference?
reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571DFC30.10003@pseudoterminal.org \
--to=dv@pseudoterminal.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.