From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
lee.jones@linaro.org, milo.kim@ti.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com
Cc: sbkim73@samsung.com, tony@atomide.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] mfd: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_regmap_add_irq_chip
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:22:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E1305.6070009@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571DF7D9.8050500@samsung.com>
On Monday 25 April 2016 04:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 02:25 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> This series is an effort to reduce the code in error path and need of
>> remove callback by using the devm_mfd_add_devices() and
>> devm_regmap_add_irq_chip() or devm_request_threaded_irq APIs for interrupt
>> support.
>>
>> This is tested with build and comiplation only with arm64 defconfig and enabling
>> the required MFD CONFIGs.
> Please compile it also on ARMv7. The changes look trivial but one
> compilation without testing might not be sufficient.
Sure. Thank you very much for testing.
I did build test with the ARMv7 for all patches and testing on actual
platform with Jetson-TX1 platform + max77620 which have similar change
with bind/unbind. This is what I learn from you for testing the remove
callback/unbinding without making =m on RTC patches and this really
helps me on my lots of testing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
<lee.jones@linaro.org>, <milo.kim@ti.com>,
<cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: <sbkim73@samsung.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] mfd: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_regmap_add_irq_chip
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:22:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E1305.6070009@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571DF7D9.8050500@samsung.com>
On Monday 25 April 2016 04:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 02:25 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> This series is an effort to reduce the code in error path and need of
>> remove callback by using the devm_mfd_add_devices() and
>> devm_regmap_add_irq_chip() or devm_request_threaded_irq APIs for interrupt
>> support.
>>
>> This is tested with build and comiplation only with arm64 defconfig and enabling
>> the required MFD CONFIGs.
> Please compile it also on ARMv7. The changes look trivial but one
> compilation without testing might not be sufficient.
Sure. Thank you very much for testing.
I did build test with the ARMv7 for all patches and testing on actual
platform with Jetson-TX1 platform + max77620 which have similar change
with bind/unbind. This is what I learn from you for testing the remove
callback/unbinding without making =m on RTC patches and this really
helps me on my lots of testing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 12:25 [PATCH 0/7] mfd: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_regmap_add_irq_chip Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] mfd: as3722: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 9:07 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] mfd: lp8788: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 23:15 ` Kim, Milo
2016-04-21 23:15 ` Kim, Milo
2016-04-22 8:50 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-22 8:50 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] mfd: max77686: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-25 10:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-28 9:01 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-28 10:02 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 10:02 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 10:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-28 9:08 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] mfd: rc5t583: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_request_threaded_irq Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 9:08 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] mfd: sec: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_regmap_add_irq_chip Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-25 12:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-28 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] mfd: tps65910: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-21 12:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] mfd: wl1273-core: Use devm_mfd_add_devices() for mfd_device registration Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-21 12:25 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-28 9:11 ` Lee Jones
2016-04-25 10:56 ` [PATCH 0/7] mfd: Use devm_mfd_add_devices and devm_regmap_add_irq_chip Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-25 12:52 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2016-04-25 12:52 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571E1305.6070009@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
--cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.