All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)"
	<drivshin.allworx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Goodbody
	<andrew.goodbody-nYQdZkeIoGZN8Ch2cx6nig@public.gmane.org>,
	Markus Brunner
	<systemprogrammierung.brunner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:14:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E6C7F.10704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571A210E.2020607-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

On 04/22/2016 04:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:19 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin-5fOYsn7Fw8lBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
>> phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
>> field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field 
>> should
>> be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.
>>
>> This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
>> mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be 
>> used
>> by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin-5fOYsn7Fw8lBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
>> as 4.4.
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> - Rebased (no conflicts)
>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

In my opinion, it will be good to have this patch merged as part of -rc cycle, since
it will fix "NULL pointer dereference" issue with current LKML as reported by Andrew Goodbody.


> 
>>
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 42fdfd4..d69cb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
>>       __raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
>>   }
>>
>>   struct cpsw_priv {
>>       spinlock_t            lock;
>>       struct platform_device        *pdev;
>>       struct net_device        *ndev;
>> -    struct device_node        *phy_node;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_rx;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_tx;
>>       struct device            *dev;
>>       struct cpsw_platform_data    data;
>>       struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem    *regs;
>>       struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem    *wr_regs;
>>       u8 __iomem            *hw_stats;
>> @@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>>
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
>>       else
>>           cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>>                      1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
>>
>> -    if (priv->phy_node)
>> -        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> +    if (slave->data->phy_node)
>> +        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       else
>>           slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
>>           dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
>>               slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
>> @@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
>>
>>       slave->data    = data;
>>       slave->regs    = regs + slave_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->sliver    = regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
>>   }
>>

[..]

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2 1/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:14:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E6C7F.10704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571A210E.2020607@ti.com>

On 04/22/2016 04:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:19 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
>>
>> Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
>> phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
>> field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field 
>> should
>> be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.
>>
>> This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
>> mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be 
>> used
>> by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
>> as 4.4.
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> - Rebased (no conflicts)
>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

In my opinion, it will be good to have this patch merged as part of -rc cycle, since
it will fix "NULL pointer dereference" issue with current LKML as reported by Andrew Goodbody.


> 
>>
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 42fdfd4..d69cb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
>>       __raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
>>   }
>>
>>   struct cpsw_priv {
>>       spinlock_t            lock;
>>       struct platform_device        *pdev;
>>       struct net_device        *ndev;
>> -    struct device_node        *phy_node;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_rx;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_tx;
>>       struct device            *dev;
>>       struct cpsw_platform_data    data;
>>       struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem    *regs;
>>       struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem    *wr_regs;
>>       u8 __iomem            *hw_stats;
>> @@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>>
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
>>       else
>>           cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>>                      1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
>>
>> -    if (priv->phy_node)
>> -        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> +    if (slave->data->phy_node)
>> +        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       else
>>           slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
>>           dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
>>               slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
>> @@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
>>
>>       slave->data    = data;
>>       slave->regs    = regs + slave_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->sliver    = regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
>>   }
>>

[..]

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" <drivshin.allworx@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>,
	Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@cambrionix.com>,
	Markus Brunner <systemprogrammierung.brunner@gmail.com>,
	Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:14:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E6C7F.10704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571A210E.2020607@ti.com>

On 04/22/2016 04:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:19 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
>>
>> Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
>> phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
>> field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field 
>> should
>> be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.
>>
>> This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
>> mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be 
>> used
>> by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@allworx.com>
>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
>> as 4.4.
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> - Rebased (no conflicts)
>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

In my opinion, it will be good to have this patch merged as part of -rc cycle, since
it will fix "NULL pointer dereference" issue with current LKML as reported by Andrew Goodbody.


> 
>>
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 42fdfd4..d69cb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
>>       __raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
>>   }
>>
>>   struct cpsw_priv {
>>       spinlock_t            lock;
>>       struct platform_device        *pdev;
>>       struct net_device        *ndev;
>> -    struct device_node        *phy_node;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_rx;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_tx;
>>       struct device            *dev;
>>       struct cpsw_platform_data    data;
>>       struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem    *regs;
>>       struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem    *wr_regs;
>>       u8 __iomem            *hw_stats;
>> @@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>>
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
>>       else
>>           cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>>                      1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
>>
>> -    if (priv->phy_node)
>> -        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> +    if (slave->data->phy_node)
>> +        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       else
>>           slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
>>           dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
>>               slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
>> @@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
>>
>>       slave->data    = data;
>>       slave->regs    = regs + slave_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->sliver    = regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
>>   }
>>

[..]

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)"
	<drivshin.allworx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Goodbody
	<andrew.goodbody-nYQdZkeIoGZN8Ch2cx6nig@public.gmane.org>,
	Markus Brunner
	<systemprogrammierung.brunner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:14:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E6C7F.10704@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571A210E.2020607-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

On 04/22/2016 04:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:19 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin-5fOYsn7Fw8lBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
>> phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
>> field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field 
>> should
>> be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.
>>
>> This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
>> mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be 
>> used
>> by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin-5fOYsn7Fw8lBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
>> as 4.4.
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> - Rebased (no conflicts)
>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

In my opinion, it will be good to have this patch merged as part of -rc cycle, since
it will fix "NULL pointer dereference" issue with current LKML as reported by Andrew Goodbody.


> 
>>
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 42fdfd4..d69cb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
>>       __raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
>>   }
>>
>>   struct cpsw_priv {
>>       spinlock_t            lock;
>>       struct platform_device        *pdev;
>>       struct net_device        *ndev;
>> -    struct device_node        *phy_node;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_rx;
>>       struct napi_struct        napi_tx;
>>       struct device            *dev;
>>       struct cpsw_platform_data    data;
>>       struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem    *regs;
>>       struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem    *wr_regs;
>>       u8 __iomem            *hw_stats;
>> @@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>>
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
>>       else
>>           cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>>                      1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
>>
>> -    if (priv->phy_node)
>> -        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> +    if (slave->data->phy_node)
>> +        slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       else
>>           slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
>>                    &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
>>       if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
>>           dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
>>               slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
>> @@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave 
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
>>
>>       slave->data    = data;
>>       slave->regs    = regs + slave_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->sliver    = regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
>>       slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
>>   }
>>

[..]

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 17:50 [PATCH net v2 0/3] drivers: net: cpsw: phy-handle fixes David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 17:50 ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 17:50 ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:19 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix parsing of phy-handle DT property in dual_emac config David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:19   ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-22 13:03   ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Grygorii Strashko
     [not found]     ` <571A210E.2020607-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-25 19:14       ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2016-04-25 19:14         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-25 19:14         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-25 19:14         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-26 15:27         ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-26 15:27           ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:26 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] drivers: net: cpsw: fix error messages when using phy-handle DT property David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:26   ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-22 13:03   ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 15:45     ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-22 15:45       ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-22 15:45       ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-25 19:12       ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-25 19:12         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-25 19:12         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-25 21:55         ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-25 21:55           ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-25 21:55           ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-26  7:50           ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-26  7:50             ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-26  7:50             ` Grygorii Strashko
     [not found] ` <1461261035-5578-1-git-send-email-drivshin.allworx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-21 18:41   ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] drivers: net: cpsw: use of_phy_connect() in fixed-link case David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:41     ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
2016-04-21 18:41     ` David Rivshin (Allworx)
     [not found]     ` <1461264066-12358-1-git-send-email-drivshin.allworx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-22 13:34       ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:34         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:34         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22 13:34         ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-04-22  6:55 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] drivers: net: cpsw: phy-handle fixes Mugunthan V N
2016-04-22  6:55   ` Mugunthan V N
2016-04-22  6:55   ` Mugunthan V N
2016-04-22  6:55   ` Mugunthan V N
2016-04-22 13:44 ` Andrew Goodbody
2016-04-22 13:44   ` Andrew Goodbody

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571E6C7F.10704@ti.com \
    --to=grygorii.strashko-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=andrew.goodbody-nYQdZkeIoGZN8Ch2cx6nig@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=drivshin.allworx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kwizart-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=systemprogrammierung.brunner-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.