All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:51:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571F8E7D.4000706@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461069013-13292-5-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hi Sudeep,

On 4/19/2016 6:30 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +struct acpi_processor_lpi *lpi;
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_processor_lpi *lpi, int idx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!idx) {
> +		cpu_do_idle();
> +		return idx;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* TODO cpu_pm_{enter,exit} can be done in generic code ? */
> +	ret = cpu_pm_enter();
Can we avoid calling cpu_pm_enter and cpu_pm_exit for retention states as it is not necessary?
May be we can check LPI architecture specific context loss flags prior to calling these.
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Pass idle state index to cpu_suspend which in turn will
> +		 * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a
> +		 * parameter.
> +		 */
> +		ret = arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx);
> +
> +		cpu_pm_exit();
same here
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret ? -1 : idx;
> +}
> +

By the way, thanks for posting these patches!

-Prashanth

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pprakash@codeaurora.org (Prakash, Prashanth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:51:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571F8E7D.4000706@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461069013-13292-5-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hi Sudeep,

On 4/19/2016 6:30 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +struct acpi_processor_lpi *lpi;
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_processor_lpi *lpi, int idx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!idx) {
> +		cpu_do_idle();
> +		return idx;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* TODO cpu_pm_{enter,exit} can be done in generic code ? */
> +	ret = cpu_pm_enter();
Can we avoid calling cpu_pm_enter and cpu_pm_exit for retention states as it is not necessary?
May be we can check LPI architecture specific context loss flags prior to calling these.
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Pass idle state index to cpu_suspend which in turn will
> +		 * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a
> +		 * parameter.
> +		 */
> +		ret = arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx);
> +
> +		cpu_pm_exit();
same here
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret ? -1 : idx;
> +}
> +

By the way, thanks for posting these patches!

-Prashanth

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:49   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 12:49     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 12:49     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 12:49     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 13:00     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 13:00       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 13:00       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20  9:56   ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20  9:57     ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20  9:56     ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:09     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:09       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:09       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-09 23:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10  0:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10  0:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:07     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 15:07       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 15:07       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-10  0:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10  0:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11  0:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11  0:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 15:06       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 20:45       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 20:45         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers: psci: refactor psci_cpu_init_idle in preparation for ACPI LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-09 13:24   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-09 13:24     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-09 14:26     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-09 14:26       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 13:59   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 13:59     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 13:59     ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-19 15:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 15:42       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20  9:59   ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20  9:59     ` Vikas Sajjan
2016-04-20 10:20     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:20       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-20 10:39   ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-20 10:39     ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-20 10:39     ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-04-26 15:51   ` Prakash, Prashanth [this message]
2016-04-26 15:51     ` Prakash, Prashanth
2016-04-26 16:01     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-26 16:01       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11  0:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11  0:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 15:06     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-05-11 15:06       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
2016-04-19 12:30   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571F8E7D.4000706@codeaurora.org \
    --to=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.