From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: use accessor macros for l_flags
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:51:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5721425D.5050606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461795667-29035-6-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
>
> Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
> bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
> operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
>
> The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
> Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2906
> Reviewed-by: Keith Mannthey <Keith.Mannthey@intel.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7963
> Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> ---
> .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 3 +
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: use accessor macros for l_flags
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:51:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5721425D.5050606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461795667-29035-6-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
>
> Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
> bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
> operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
>
> The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
> Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2906
> Reviewed-by: Keith Mannthey <Keith.Mannthey@intel.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7963
> Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> ---
> .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 3 +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 22:20 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/15] patches missing from lustre 2.5.51 James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/15] staging: lustre: llite: reset writeback index in ll_writepages James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/15] staging: lustre: llite: NFS reexport issue James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/15] staging: lustre: obdclass: add LCT_SERVER_SESSION for server session James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/15] staging: lustre: lmv: kernel crash due to misconfigured MDT James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: use accessor macros for l_flags James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:51 ` Bruce Korb [this message]
2016-04-27 22:51 ` Bruce Korb
2016-04-28 8:19 ` [lustre-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2016-04-28 8:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: clean up l_flags James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove code wireshark handling James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:20 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: update comments about ldlm l_flags James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/15] staging: lustre: llite: Replace printing of i_ino with ll_inode2fid() James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/15] staging: lustre: clio: add debug message in osc_completion() James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/15] staging: lustre: mgc: fix 'error handling' issues James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/15] staging: lustre: osc: Track and limit "unstable" pages James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/15] staging: lustre: osc: Track number of "unstable" pages per osc James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/15] staging: lustre: osc: Use SOFT_SYNC to urge server commit James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/15] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: quiet warning for 2.1/2.5 connections James Simmons
2016-04-27 22:21 ` James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5721425D.5050606@gmail.com \
--to=bruce.korb@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.