Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testpmd: extend commands for better scatter-gather tests

[Maciej Czekaj <maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:13:20 +0000 De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maciej Czekaj [mailto:maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:10 PM
>> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Mcnamara, John
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] testpmd: extend commands for
>> better scatter-gather tests
>>
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:52:59 +0000 De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com
>>>> [mailto:maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 3:51 PM
>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; Mcnamara, John; Maciej Czekaj
>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] testpmd: extend commands for better scatter-
>> gather
>>>> tests
>>>>
>>>> From: Maciej Czekaj <maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
>>>>
>>>> v2:
>>>>    - included documentation changes
>>>>    - added value check for "port config all txqflags" as in --tqxflags
>> paramater
>>>>
>>>> Maciej Czekaj (3):
>>>>     app/testpmd: add "enable-scatter" parameter
>>>>     app/testpmd: extend port config with scatter parameter
>>>>     app/testpmd: support setting up txq_flags value in command line
>>>>
>>>>    app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 86
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>    app/test-pmd/parameters.c                   |  3 +
>>>>    doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst       |  4 ++
>>>>    doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 20 +++++++
>>>>    4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>> Series-acked-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Just one comment, maybe we should include some extra info in "show port
>> info all", like txqflags or scatter mode.
>>>
>>
>> txqflags is displayed in:
>>    - a forwarding info upon start command
>>    - show txq info
>>
>> scatter mode is displayed in:
>>    - show rxq info
>>
>> Still I think it is a good point to aggregate it in port info.
>>
>> I will address it in v3.
>
> Oh, true, good point. Then, probably not necessary, as we would be duplicating  information.
>

If you think it is not necessary to add another place for that info than 
I think we're fine with v2.