[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.

Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.

The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg498129.html

Vladimir Zapolskiy (3):
  MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section
  MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC
  MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section

 MAINTAINERS | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.

Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.

The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg498129.html

Vladimir Zapolskiy (3):
  MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section
  MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC
  MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section

 MAINTAINERS | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

A record of NXP LPC32xx SoC support is lost between LMxx hwmon drivers
and lockdep, rename and move it to a place where all other ARM
SoC and machines settle.

Note, NXP LPC32xx maintenance is actually about SoC series itself, SoC
peripherals and a number of machines powered by LPC32xx SoC, so while
we are here correct the title name to emphasize that the maintenance
concerns SoC support in general.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 03e00c7..233c9bf 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1306,6 +1306,12 @@ F:	drivers/mtd/spi-nor/nxp-spifi.c
 F:	drivers/rtc/rtc-lpc24xx.c
 N:	lpc18xx
 
+ARM/LPC32XX SOC SUPPORT
+M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
+L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+S:	Maintained
+F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
+
 ARM/MAGICIAN MACHINE SUPPORT
 M:	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
 S:	Maintained
@@ -6775,12 +6781,6 @@ W:	logfs.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	fs/logfs/
 
-LPC32XX MACHINE SUPPORT
-M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
-L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
-S:	Maintained
-F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
-
 LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI)
 M:	Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>
 M:	Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

A record of NXP LPC32xx SoC support is lost between LMxx hwmon drivers
and lockdep, rename and move it to a place where all other ARM
SoC and machines settle.

Note, NXP LPC32xx maintenance is actually about SoC series itself, SoC
peripherals and a number of machines powered by LPC32xx SoC, so while
we are here correct the title name to emphasize that the maintenance
concerns SoC support in general.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 03e00c7..233c9bf 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1306,6 +1306,12 @@ F:	drivers/mtd/spi-nor/nxp-spifi.c
 F:	drivers/rtc/rtc-lpc24xx.c
 N:	lpc18xx
 
+ARM/LPC32XX SOC SUPPORT
+M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
+L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+S:	Maintained
+F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
+
 ARM/MAGICIAN MACHINE SUPPORT
 M:	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
 S:	Maintained
@@ -6775,12 +6781,6 @@ W:	logfs.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	fs/logfs/
 
-LPC32XX MACHINE SUPPORT
-M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
-L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
-S:	Maintained
-F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
-
 LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI)
 M:	Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>
 M:	Chaitra P B <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.

Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 233c9bf..e70c5a8 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1307,8 +1307,10 @@ F:	drivers/rtc/rtc-lpc24xx.c
 N:	lpc18xx
 
 ARM/LPC32XX SOC SUPPORT
-M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
+M:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
+M:	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+T:	git git://github.com/vzapolskiy/linux-lpc32xx.git
 S:	Maintained
 F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.

Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 233c9bf..e70c5a8 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1307,8 +1307,10 @@ F:	drivers/rtc/rtc-lpc24xx.c
 N:	lpc18xx
 
 ARM/LPC32XX SOC SUPPORT
-M:	Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
+M:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
+M:	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+T:	git git://github.com/vzapolskiy/linux-lpc32xx.git
 S:	Maintained
 F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

The change adds a list of files for maintenance under NXP LPC32xx
section, the listed files are NXP LPC32xx SoC series mach files,
DTS files of NXP LPC32xx SoC powered boards and NXP LPC32xx SoC
peripheral drivers, most of the peripheral driver file names match
'lpc32xx' pattern.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e70c5a8..117a3c3 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1312,7 +1312,13 @@ M:	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 T:	git git://github.com/vzapolskiy/linux-lpc32xx.git
 S:	Maintained
+F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32*
 F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
+F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c
+F:	drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
+F:	drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c
+F:	drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c
+N:	lpc32xx
 
 ARM/MAGICIAN MACHINE SUPPORT
 M:	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

The change adds a list of files for maintenance under NXP LPC32xx
section, the listed files are NXP LPC32xx SoC series mach files,
DTS files of NXP LPC32xx SoC powered boards and NXP LPC32xx SoC
peripheral drivers, most of the peripheral driver file names match
'lpc32xx' pattern.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e70c5a8..117a3c3 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1312,7 +1312,13 @@ M:	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 T:	git git://github.com/vzapolskiy/linux-lpc32xx.git
 S:	Maintained
+F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32*
 F:	arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/
+F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c
+F:	drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
+F:	drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c
+F:	drivers/watchdog/pnx4008_wdt.c
+N:	lpc32xx
 
 ARM/MAGICIAN MACHINE SUPPORT
 M:	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> 
> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> 
> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> 

Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.

Thanks,

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> 
> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> 
> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> 

Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.

Thanks,

	Arnd

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Hi Arnd,

On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>
>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>
>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>
> 
> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> 

to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.

In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.

If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, for
your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm at kernel.org.

For what it's worth this is a link to the last discussion with Roland
on LAKML (the discussed problems are handled at the moment):
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-April/337078.html

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

Hi Arnd,

On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>
>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>
>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>
> 
> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> 

to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.

In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.

If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for
your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org.

For what it's worth this is a link to the last discussion with Roland
on LAKML (the discussed problems are handled at the moment):
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-April/337078.html

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> >> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> >> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> >>
> >> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> >> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> >> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> >>
> >> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> >>
> > 
> > Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> > and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> > 
> 
> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
> 
> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
> 
> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, for
> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm at kernel.org.

It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
the two of you the primary contacts now.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> >> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> >> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> >>
> >> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> >> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> >> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> >>
> >> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> >>
> > 
> > Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> > and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> > 
> 
> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
> 
> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
> 
> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for
> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org.

It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
the two of you the primary contacts now.

	Arnd

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

On 29.04.2016 02:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>>>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>>>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>>>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>>>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>>>
>>>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
>>> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
>>>
>>
>> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
>> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
>> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
>>
>> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
>> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
>> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
>>
>> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
>> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, for
>> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm at kernel.org.
> 
> It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
> separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
> I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
> the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
> the two of you the primary contacts now.
> 

Sounds good, I offload that anxiety from my mind then.

Thank you.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

On 29.04.2016 02:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>>>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>>>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>>>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>>>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>>>
>>>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
>>> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
>>>
>>
>> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
>> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
>> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
>>
>> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
>> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
>> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
>>
>> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
>> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for
>> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org.
> 
> It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
> separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
> I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
> the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
> the two of you the primary contacts now.
> 

Sounds good, I offload that anxiety from my mind then.

Thank you.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

[PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> 
> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> 
> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> 
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg498129.html
> 

Applied all three to next/soc, thanks!

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> 
> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> 
> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> 
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg498129.html
> 

Applied all three to next/soc, thanks!

	Arnd