From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: fu.wei@linaro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, wim@iguana.be,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:07:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160503143856.GE13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com>
Pratyush Anand wrote:
> In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for
> action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that
would be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real
users want to have action=1 and a longer timeout.
I've never been a fan of the action=1 option, and I'm certainly not keen
any patches that make action=1 more complicated than it already is.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:07:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160503143856.GE13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com>
Pratyush Anand wrote:
> In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for
> action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that
would be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real
users want to have action=1 and a longer timeout.
I've never been a fan of the action=1 option, and I'm certainly not keen
any patches that make action=1 more complicated than it already is.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-03 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-03 8:20 [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 8:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 12:12 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-03 12:12 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-03 13:24 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 13:24 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 14:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 14:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 14:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 14:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 15:04 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-03 15:04 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-03 13:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 13:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 14:38 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 14:38 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 15:07 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2016-05-03 15:07 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-03 15:51 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 15:51 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-03 17:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-03 17:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-04 14:14 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-04 14:14 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-04 14:21 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-04 14:21 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-04 15:59 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-04 15:59 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-04 16:17 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-04 16:17 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 16:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 16:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 18:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-05 18:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-05 18:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-05-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 18:22 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:38 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:38 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:38 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:45 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:45 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-05 23:45 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-06 0:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-06 0:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-06 0:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-05 23:51 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org \
--to=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.