From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4.
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:07:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <572B0D6D.4020802@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c63ca37-0e7e-ac7f-a6d2-c7822e3d611f@linux.intel.com>
On 04/05/16 13:38, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
> vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
> nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
> exceptions.
>
> drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert
> is impossible. There is no way to remove the framebuffer from the lists
> and active planes without introducing a race because of the different
> locking requirements. Instead call drm_framebuffer_remove from a
> workqueue, which is unaffected by signals.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Add comment.
> Changes since v2:
> - Add fastpath for refcount = 1. (danvet)
> Changes since v3:
> - Rebased.
> - Restore lastclose framebuffer removal too.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.4+
> Fixes: 13803132818c ("drm/core: Preserve the framebuffer after removing it.")
> Testcase: kms_rmfb_basic
> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-March/102876.html
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Tested-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> #v3
Can't be 100% since apparently eDP regressed a lot recently for me, but
seems to be effective in getting rid of stale planes in my test cases.
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 9626a0cc050a..9a3d17b70091 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -3440,6 +3440,24 @@ int drm_mode_addfb2(struct drm_device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct drm_mode_rmfb_work {
> + struct work_struct work;
> + struct list_head fbs;
> +};
> +
> +static void drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> + struct drm_mode_rmfb_work *arg = container_of(w, typeof(*arg), work);
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&arg->fbs)) {
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb =
> + list_first_entry(&arg->fbs, typeof(*fb), filp_head);
> +
> + list_del_init(&fb->filp_head);
> + drm_framebuffer_remove(fb);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drm_mode_rmfb - remove an FB from the configuration
> * @dev: drm device for the ioctl
> @@ -3480,12 +3498,29 @@ int drm_mode_rmfb(struct drm_device *dev,
> list_del_init(&fb->filp_head);
> mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
>
> - /* we now own the reference that was stored in the fbs list */
> - drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> -
> /* drop the reference we picked up in framebuffer lookup */
> drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
>
> + /*
> + * we now own the reference that was stored in the fbs list
> + *
> + * drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR on pending signals,
> + * so run this in a separate stack as there's no way to correctly
> + * handle this after the fb is already removed from the lookup table.
> + */
> + if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(fb) > 1) {
> + struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
> +
> + INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&arg.fbs);
> + list_add_tail(&fb->filp_head, &arg.fbs);
> +
> + schedule_work(&arg.work);
> + flush_work(&arg.work);
> + destroy_work_on_stack(&arg.work);
> + } else
> + drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> +
> return 0;
>
> fail_unref:
> @@ -3635,7 +3670,6 @@ out_err1:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -
> /**
> * drm_fb_release - remove and free the FBs on this file
> * @priv: drm file for the ioctl
> @@ -3650,6 +3684,9 @@ out_err1:
> void drm_fb_release(struct drm_file *priv)
> {
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb, *tfb;
> + struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&arg.fbs);
>
> /*
> * When the file gets released that means no one else can access the fb
> @@ -3662,10 +3699,22 @@ void drm_fb_release(struct drm_file *priv)
> * at it any more.
> */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(fb, tfb, &priv->fbs, filp_head) {
> - list_del_init(&fb->filp_head);
> + if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(fb) > 1) {
> + list_move_tail(&fb->filp_head, &arg.fbs);
> + } else {
> + list_del_init(&fb->filp_head);
>
> - /* This drops the fpriv->fbs reference. */
> - drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> + /* This drops the fpriv->fbs reference. */
> + drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!list_empty(&arg.fbs)) {
> + INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn);
> +
> + schedule_work(&arg.work);
> + flush_work(&arg.work);
> + destroy_work_on_stack(&arg.work);
> }
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-05 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 9:58 [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-22 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11 7:30 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-12 10:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-04-12 10:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-02 9:07 ` [REBASED PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-02 9:07 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-03 12:01 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Hellstrom
2016-05-04 12:10 ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms: Add test for testing rmfb framebuffer removal handling Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-05 9:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-05 11:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-05 9:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-05-05 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-20 20:32 [PATCH 4.6 backport] " Hans de Goede
2016-06-20 20:32 ` [PATCH] " Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=572B0D6D.4020802@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.