From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:49:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57331C3F.2000708@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2700de4-623a-cae4-028b-8fe0aa82f75c@redhat.com>
On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc,
>>> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with
>>> kvm-pr,
>>> while it is fine with kvm-hv.
>>>
>>> When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr,
>>> the kernel logs are filled with:
>>>
>>> Couldn't emulate instruction 0x00000000 (op 0 xop 0)
>>> kvmppc_handle_exit_pr: emulation at 700 failed (00000000)
>>>
>>> While the exception handler receives an interrupt for each instruction
>>> executed after the illegal instruction.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> index 2afdb9c..4ee969d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> switch (get_op(inst)) {
>>> case 0:
>>> - emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
>>> if ((kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) &&
>>> (inst = swab32(inst_sc))) {
>>> /*
>>> @@ -112,6 +111,9 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, EV_UNIMPLEMENTED);
>>> kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4);
>>> emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
>>> + } else {
>>> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
>> But isn't that exactly what the semantic of EMULATE_FAIL is? Fixing it
>> up in book3s_emulate.c is definitely the wrong spot.
>>
>> So what is the problem you're trying to solve? Is the SRR0 at the wrong
>> spot or are the log messages the problem?
> No, the problem is the host kernel logs are filled by the message and
> the execution hangs. And the host becomes unresponsiveness, even after
> the end of the tests.
>
> Please, try to run kvm-unit-tests (the emulator test) on a KVM-PR host,
> and check the kernel logs (dmesg), then try to ssh to the host...
Ok, so the log messages are the problem. Please fix the message output
then - or remove it altogether. Or if you like, create a module
parameter that allows you to emit them.
I personally think the best solution would be to just convert the
message into a trace point.
While at it, please see whether the guest can trigger similar host log
output excess in other code paths.
Alex
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:49:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57331C3F.2000708@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2700de4-623a-cae4-028b-8fe0aa82f75c@redhat.com>
On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc,
>>> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with
>>> kvm-pr,
>>> while it is fine with kvm-hv.
>>>
>>> When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr,
>>> the kernel logs are filled with:
>>>
>>> Couldn't emulate instruction 0x00000000 (op 0 xop 0)
>>> kvmppc_handle_exit_pr: emulation at 700 failed (00000000)
>>>
>>> While the exception handler receives an interrupt for each instruction
>>> executed after the illegal instruction.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> index 2afdb9c..4ee969d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> switch (get_op(inst)) {
>>> case 0:
>>> - emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
>>> if ((kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) &&
>>> (inst == swab32(inst_sc))) {
>>> /*
>>> @@ -112,6 +111,9 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, EV_UNIMPLEMENTED);
>>> kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4);
>>> emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
>>> + } else {
>>> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
>> But isn't that exactly what the semantic of EMULATE_FAIL is? Fixing it
>> up in book3s_emulate.c is definitely the wrong spot.
>>
>> So what is the problem you're trying to solve? Is the SRR0 at the wrong
>> spot or are the log messages the problem?
> No, the problem is the host kernel logs are filled by the message and
> the execution hangs. And the host becomes unresponsiveness, even after
> the end of the tests.
>
> Please, try to run kvm-unit-tests (the emulator test) on a KVM-PR host,
> and check the kernel logs (dmesg), then try to ssh to the host...
Ok, so the log messages are the problem. Please fix the message output
then - or remove it altogether. Or if you like, create a module
parameter that allows you to emit them.
I personally think the best solution would be to just convert the
message into a trace point.
While at it, please see whether the guest can trigger similar host log
output excess in other code paths.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 20:18 [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions Laurent Vivier
2016-03-15 20:18 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-22 10:11 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-22 10:11 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-04-07 11:31 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-04-07 11:31 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-04-21 9:25 ` Thomas Huth
2016-04-21 9:25 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-09 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-09 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-10 17:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 17:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-11 10:35 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-11 10:35 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-11 11:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-11 11:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-11 11:49 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2016-05-11 11:49 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-12 9:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-12 9:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-12 9:27 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-12 9:27 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-12 14:23 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-12 14:23 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-12 14:23 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 8:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 8:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 8:37 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-17 8:37 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-17 17:49 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 17:49 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-18 10:18 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 10:18 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 18:39 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 18:39 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-19 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-19 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57331C3F.2000708@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.