All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "John Daley (johndale)" <johndale@cisco.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"helin.zhang@intel.com" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"arnon@qwilt.com" <arnon@qwilt.com>,
	"rolette@infinite.io" <rolette@infinite.io>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mbuf: remove unused rx error flags
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 11:25:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57344C06.1030007@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78fd3211f25f4d42aa481f6d741c8121@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>

Hi,

On 05/12/2016 03:32 AM, John Daley (johndale) wrote:
>> This patch removes the unused flags from rte_mbuf, and their use in
>> the drivers. The enic driver is modified to drop bad packets, but
>> i40e and fm10k are kept as they are today and should be fixed to
>> drop bad packets.
>
> Perhaps the change to enic to drop bad packets should be handled as a
> separate patch since it's not strictly related to not removing the
> use of the flags?

Yes, it's probably better to have it in a separate patch.

>> John, I did not test the patch on the enic driver, so please review
>> it carefully.
>>
>
> The patch works for enic, thanks. There are a few minor changes for
> performance: - put an unlikely in the if (packet_error) conditional -
> remove the if (!packet_error) conditional since it will always be
> true. Let me know if you would prefer I submit the enic patch
> separately.

I'll do it, thanks for reviewing.
I'll wait a bit for other comments before sending a first version of
the patchset.

Regards,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-12  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29 12:25 removing mbuf error flags Olivier Matz
2016-04-29 17:47 ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-29 18:16 ` Don Provan
2016-04-29 18:24   ` Jay Rolette
2016-04-29 20:00     ` Arnon Warshavsky
2016-04-29 20:57       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-04-30  1:41         ` Don Provan
2016-05-10  8:40           ` [RFC] mbuf: remove unused rx " Olivier Matz
2016-05-12  1:32             ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-05-12  9:25               ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2016-05-23  7:56                 ` [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused Rx " Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 11:39                   ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 12:39                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 14:00                     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 12:42                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 12:49                     ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 13:25                       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 13:52                         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57344C06.1030007@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=arnon@qwilt.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=johndale@cisco.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=rolette@infinite.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.