All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	socketpair@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: fix max discard sectors calculation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:56:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573C9EB1.1090208@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573B91D7.8020002@redhat.com>

On 05/17/2016 02:49 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> @@ -821,13 +821,15 @@ struct se_device *target_alloc_device(struct se_hba *hba, const char *name)
>    * in ATA and we need to set TPE=1
>    */
>   bool target_configure_unmap_from_queue(struct se_dev_attrib *attrib,
> -				       struct request_queue *q, int block_size)
> +				       struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> +	unsigned short block_size = queue_logical_block_size(q);
> +
>   	if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
>   		return false;
>
> -	attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = (q->limits.max_discard_sectors << 9) /
> -								block_size;
> +	attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = queue_sector_to_logical(q,
> +						q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>   	/*
>   	 * Currently hardcoded to 1 in Linux/SCSI code..
>   	 */
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> index 75f0f08..7929186 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static int fd_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
>   			dev_size, div_u64(dev_size, fd_dev->fd_block_size),
>   			fd_dev->fd_block_size);
>
> -		if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
> -						      fd_dev->fd_block_size))
> +		if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>   			pr_debug("IFILE: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>   				 " disabled by default\n");
>   		/*
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index 026a758..3cbe060 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
>   	dev->dev_attrib.hw_max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(q);
>   	dev->dev_attrib.hw_queue_depth = q->nr_requests;
>
> -	if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
> -					      dev->dev_attrib.hw_block_size))
> +	if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>   		pr_debug("IBLOCK: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>   			 " disabled by default\n");
>
 > [ ... ]

Hello Mike,

Are you sure that LIO guarantees that dev_attrib.hw_block_size is 
identical to queue_logical_block_size(q)? The other changes in this 
patch look like a nice improvement to me.

Bart.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<socketpair@gmail.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: fix max discard sectors calculation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:56:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573C9EB1.1090208@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573B91D7.8020002@redhat.com>

On 05/17/2016 02:49 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> @@ -821,13 +821,15 @@ struct se_device *target_alloc_device(struct se_hba *hba, const char *name)
>    * in ATA and we need to set TPE=1
>    */
>   bool target_configure_unmap_from_queue(struct se_dev_attrib *attrib,
> -				       struct request_queue *q, int block_size)
> +				       struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> +	unsigned short block_size = queue_logical_block_size(q);
> +
>   	if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
>   		return false;
>
> -	attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = (q->limits.max_discard_sectors << 9) /
> -								block_size;
> +	attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = queue_sector_to_logical(q,
> +						q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>   	/*
>   	 * Currently hardcoded to 1 in Linux/SCSI code..
>   	 */
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> index 75f0f08..7929186 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static int fd_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
>   			dev_size, div_u64(dev_size, fd_dev->fd_block_size),
>   			fd_dev->fd_block_size);
>
> -		if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
> -						      fd_dev->fd_block_size))
> +		if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>   			pr_debug("IFILE: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>   				 " disabled by default\n");
>   		/*
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index 026a758..3cbe060 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
>   	dev->dev_attrib.hw_max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(q);
>   	dev->dev_attrib.hw_queue_depth = q->nr_requests;
>
> -	if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
> -					      dev->dev_attrib.hw_block_size))
> +	if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>   		pr_debug("IBLOCK: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>   			 " disabled by default\n");
>
 > [ ... ]

Hello Mike,

Are you sure that LIO guarantees that dev_attrib.hw_block_size is 
identical to queue_logical_block_size(q)? The other changes in this 
patch look like a nice improvement to me.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-18 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16 18:46 [PATCH 0/2] fix max discard sectors calculation mchristi
2016-05-16 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: " mchristi
2016-05-16 22:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-16 22:44     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-17  3:46     ` Mike Christie
2016-05-16 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] target: " mchristi
2016-05-16 18:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-16 18:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-16 19:00     ` Mike Christie
2016-05-16 19:02     ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-05-16 19:02       ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-05-17 18:16       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-17 18:16         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-17 21:49         ` Mike Christie
2016-05-18 16:56           ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2016-05-18 16:56             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-18 17:17             ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573C9EB1.1090208@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=socketpair@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.